A recent analysis of the composition of the Chassingy meteorite, which originated from Mars and hit our planet in 1815, revealed that the Red Planet possibly formed its core from different materials than originally thought.
Scientists previously believed that the core of Mars was formed by the gases of the young Solar System's nebula, with meteorites bringing in additional volatile elements later. This assumption was based on an earlier examination of the meteorite, which revealed the presence of xenon – an inert gas common to nebulas. However, a new study led by the University of California took a fresh look at the two-centuries-old piece of rock:
"With xenon isotopes, it's difficult to distinguish the precise source of volatiles, but that's not the case with krypton. With krypton, you can better see the difference between potential sources like from solar or meteorites […] but krypton isotopes are more difficult to measure than xenon isotopes, "Sandrine Péron, one of the authors of the research, told the New Scientist.
The new finding suggests that the planet's core might have been formed mostly as the result of meteorite collisions. At the same time, the planet's atmosphere was largely made of gases from the solar nebula, whilst previously scientists believed that these gases were pushed out of the nebula-formed core.
The new model also suggests that Mars acquired its first atmosphere after cooling off instead of creating it at the stage when it was a molten piece of rock. The new research, however, has raised new questions: if Mars' atmosphere was created out of nebula, why wasn't it blown off like the nebula itself due to solar radiation? This question remains to be answered if the findings of the scientists from the University of California stand confirmed after peer review of their work.
Let's stay in touch no matter what! Follow our Telegram channel to get all the latest news: https://t.me/sputniknewsus