Winter of Discontent Redux?
"In the 1970s trade unions were often aggressive, demanding improved living standards for their members. The aim of the current actions is much more defensive. Unions can argue that public sector incomes have been falling in real terms for more than a decade, and pay rises which do not address today's inflationary pressures are unacceptable," Mark Garnett, a senior lecturer at the department of politics, philosophy and religion at Lancaster University, said, adding that "since the 1970s their activities have been subjected to significant legal restrictions."
"The structural power of trade unions measured by density (the proportion of workers who are union members) has declined markedly since 1979, especially in the private sector," Patrick Diamond, professor of public policy at Queen Mary University of London, noted.
"There are differences today, though. Whereas the 1970s strikes followed several years of prosperity and rising living standards, today's strikes follow more than a decade of austerity, and for millions of workers, low or no pay increases for over a decade," Dorey explained.
Public Sympathies
"While most members of the public feel sympathy with strikers (particularly nurses), this has already been fading and is likely to fall further in response to the inevitable disruption," Garnett suggested.
"Britain's newspapers always do this during strikes - 'find' people whose lives have been disrupted by a strike - to manipulate public opinion and turn it against the strikes and trade unions," the expert stated.
Government Response
"Whether or not they lose public support, they are most unlikely to return to normal working unless they receive settlements which truly reflect the cost of living crisis. This means that Sunak will be forced to compromise at some point, and promote deals which still fall below the level of inflation but are considerably more generous," Garnett continued, adding that "if he continues to appear inflexible for too long, he might find himself losing the battle for public support and he cannot afford to do this with his party already well behind in the opinion polls."
"What these [strikes] could do is encourage a realisation among diverse groups of workers in very different jobs that they actually have similar economic interests - and a common political 'enemy'! Such potential unity would be unprecedented - and dangerous for a government whose natural response is to play divide-and-rule by turning different groups of workers against each other to weaken or prevent solidarity," Dorey concluded.