World

US Prof Probed Over Alleged Involvement in Spooky Gene Altering Experiment

Editing embryos’ genes is allowed in the US only in laboratory research that does not result in any births.
Sputnik

A US university is investigating a bioengineering professor for his reported collaboration with a Chinese colleague, He Jiankui, who claims to have created the world’s first babies whose DNA has been modified by genetic editing.

Houston, Texas-based Rice University is conducting a probe into Dr Michael Deem, university spokesman Doug Miller told The Daily Caller on Wednesday.

‘This research raises troubling scientific, legal, and ethical questions. … Rice had no knowledge of this work’, Miller said.

According to The Associated Press, Michael Deem is a ‘US scientist who worked with [He] on this project after He returned to China’ and also has a stake in He’s two genetic companies based in China.

Chinese Scientist Who Created 'Gene-Edited Twins' Under Probe
Dr Deem has received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which ‘does not support the use of gene-editing technologies in human embryos’, NIH director Francis Collins said in a statement on Wednesday.

In a video posted on Monday, He Jiankui, a Stanford University alumnus, currently working at a laboratory in Shenzhen, said he had modified two embryos produced from the sperm of an HIV-positive donor and implanted them in a healthy mother, who gave birth to twin girls earlier this month.

He said he used a tool known as CRISPR-cas9, which can be inserted to deactivate a gene called CCR5 that acts as a ‘doorway’ to allow the HIV virus to enter a cell.

The scientist said that the twins’ DNA was modified to make it possible to remove and replace a strand with pinpoint precision.

He’s embryonic gene-editing has prompted a global outcry among the scientific community.

‘If true, this experiment is monstrous. There are many effective ways to prevent HIV in healthy individuals … In many other places in the world, this would be illegal, punishable by imprisonment’, Julian Savulescu, the Uehiro Chair in Practical Ethics at Oxford University, said in a statement.

Although editing embryos’ genes is allowed in the US only in laboratory research that does not result in any births, a recent Pew poll shows that a hefty 72 percent of respondents believed that embryonic gene-editing ‘to treat a serious disease or condition that the baby would have at birth’ is an appropriate use of the technology.

READ MORE: China Has Tested Gene Editing Procedures on at Least 80 People

Discuss