The Chilean government’s new plan for its lithium production is
not about nationalizing the industry, but about
recouping some of the earnings of private companies for the public purse, Ollie Vargas, writer and journalist with Kawsachun News,
told Sputnik.
Vargas described what was being mulled by one of the world's top producers of lithium - a public-private partnership - as similar to what was being carried out in other countries, like Argentina. "I wouldn't call it a full nationalization. And also, it doesn't nationalize the lithium extraction that's going on currently," he said.
Amid the
booming demand for lithium – a key element in the production of electric batteries and other green transition products – Chile is set
to wrest back more government control over the industry. Recently, the president of Chile announced a program that would call for private partners in different endeavors in this sphere, but allowing for the government of Chile, in all of these public private endeavors, to control a majority of shares.
"Existing contracts would be honored. There's not going to be any expropriation of existing projects", Chile’s President Gabriel Boric said, adding that new ones will have to be structured, with the government having the final say. There was also mention of adhering to stricter environmental protection rules and ensuring that local residents, mostly indigenous, profit from the extraction.
Albeit a limited one, it is certainly a positive reform for the country, added the journalist.
“It's an improvement on what they have at the moment, where Chile's earning very little, almost nothing from lithium extraction, very low prices in the hands of private companies. This will recoup some of that," he added.
Of course, the Chilean plan presupposed a very different model to those implemented, for example, in Mexico and Bolivia, where “all of the lithium reserves are in the hands of the state, in the hands of the public,” where there are partnerships with private companies, but “with a majority controlled by the state,” the writer added. He noted that Mexico has been generating headlines for at least a year now, as under President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, the country has been trying to take more control over refining some of the products that it sells, like oil.
Bolivia is now much further along the route of industrializing and refining lithium, the writer added. For that, it has been lambasted by Western mainstream press, like The New York Times, especially for a decision to partner with a Chinese company that would bring investment into the development of batteries and car batteries there, Ollie Vargas said.
While Bolivia and Mexico can be expected to become the target of ramped-up criticism and scaremongering for taking the route of nationalization, Chile’s moderate model will seem more "tolerable" for the US, Vargas said.
As for talk of a possible “lithium cartel” between some of the lithium producers, like Argentina, Chile, Bolivia, and Brazil, with the price set by them, it would be difficult, Vargas underscored.