"Let's just put this in perspective: if a hostile nation that was actively engaged in combat operations against the United States stated that they believe that striking the White House would be fair game, and then two drones struck the White House, I think we could assume that a) the hostile power that threatened to strike the White House was behind this attack, and b) that the United States would be fully justified in holding those who perpetrated such an attack to full account," former US Marine Corps intelligence officer Scott Ritter told Sputnik.
"Zelensky hasn't gone rogue. Zelensky is trying to perpetrate an escalation of this crisis to break Russia out of the current comfort zone it enjoys in terms of its military supremacy, to redefine this conflict with the potential of either getting more equipment, such as F-16 fighters, or getting active NATO involvement. Either way, Ukraine understands that unless something happens, it’s going to lose this conflict," Ritter stressed.
"We'll find out if this is a gross miscalculation, because again we have to come back to what started this: two drones hit the Kremlin, and I can guarantee you if two drones hit the White House, the people who perpetrated that attack would cease to exist. That's probably the future of Zelensky's government," Ritter summed up.