Uncertain World: The End of the Post-Soviet Era

© RIA NovostiFyodor Lukyanov
Fyodor Lukyanov - Sputnik International
In an article published early this week, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin announced the end of the post-Soviet era and called for something new.

In an article published early this week, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin announced the end of the post-Soviet era and called for something new. However, the presidential candidate did not specify what this something new might be. In effect, Russia’s leading politician has acknowledged that the public and political fixation on the collapse of the Soviet Union is no longer a positive, galvanizing force. Russia needs a new agenda.

The Soviet Union’s demise has been the point of departure for the Russian government in the post-Soviet period, though different governments have used the past in different ways. This began with the anti-Communism of the early 1990, when renunciation of all things Soviet served to legitimize the new authorities. However, this policy was rapidly undermined by the difficulties and setbacks of democratization and the growing discontent in society, which fueled Soviet nostalgia. The government has tried to use this nostalgia in its interests or at least to channel it in harmless ways, such as the return to Soviet aesthetics and symbols. In the 2000s the government actively revived elements of the Soviet past and periodically encouraged nostalgia to divert attention from current events. In other words, the government gained legitimacy by linking itself, whether in reality or in the popular imagination, to past glory.

The post-Soviet fixation was particularly pronounced in foreign policy. Form the early 1990s through the late 2000s Russia attempted to prove to its foreign partners that while the Soviet Union may be gone; Russia is still a key global player. It employed different methods at different times but the aim of restoring Russia’s great power status remained throughout. Russia achieved this aim, at least within the limits of what was possible, remaking Russia as a Soviet-style super power was never on the agenda. In any event, Russia reached peak political and economic power in the post-Soviet period at the end of this past decade.

There is no longer any point in appealing to the Soviet past. Russia’s Soviet-era technological capabilities have been exhausted, as numerous man-made disasters attest to. Soviet methods of resolving social problems are unacceptable today, even if they had some positive elements. The legacy of Soviet foreign policy is all but gone and the Arab Spring has swept away the last Middle East regimes that were considered Soviet allies. Finally, Soviet ideology can no longer aid Russia’s progress in any way.

Putin’s statement is an important step but now the Russian authorities must create this new reality and stop appealing to the Soviet past. Putin himself is guilty of harping on the past. Based on his past statements, you might think he is in favor of returning to the Soviet model. However, nobody in the Russian leadership has such unrealistic ambitions. Officials use pro-Soviet language due to a lack of any alternative; they still believe that the image of the lost super power can add weight to their words. The Eurasian Union proposed by Putin is a clear example of this tendency.

In effect, Putin is trying (in earnest for the first time) to set integration in the post-Soviet space on an entirely new foundation: sensible economic cooperation for the mutual benefit of its participants. European integration, as it was initially conceived, is the prototype of this project. However, speaking about the project’s prospects, Putin appeals to the Soviet economic community, creating the impression that perhaps he seeks to restore the Soviet Union. This makes his partners apprehensive and scares the rest of the world. The main challenge of the new era is to find forward-looking arguments rather than arguments rooted in the past.

Clearly, it is neither possible nor desirable to erase the past. But at some point history must cease to be a political tool and become instead an object of unbiased study. The Russian elite does itself a disservice by pedaling Soviet nostalgia because no matter how they regard the Soviet past the fact is that they are in power only as a result of the Soviet Union’s disintegration and the subsequent change in leadership. The yearning for the lost great power undermines the legitimacy of the Russian establishment that is responsible both for the Soviet Union’s demise (Russian democrats made this choice in the late 1980s) and of what has been built since then. This is why Russian officials should encourage historical optimism rather than pick at the wounds of the past. Putin has taken the first step in this direction. Now all that remains is to create the image of a better future.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s and may not necessarily represent those of RIA Novosti.


Is Russia unpredictable? Perhaps, but one shouldn’t exaggerate – its randomness often follows a consistent pattern. But is the world at large predictable? The past two decades have seen all forecasts refuted more than once and have taught us only one thing – to be ready for any change. This column is on what the nations and governments are facing in the era of global uncertainty.

Fyodor Lukyanov is Editor-in-Chief of the Russia in Global Affairs journal – the most authoritative source of expertise on Russian foreign policy and global developments. He is also a frequent commentator on international affairs and contributes to various media in the United States, Europe and China, including academic journals Social Research, Europe-Asia Studies, Columbia Journal of International Affairs. Mr. Lukyanov is a senior member of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy and a member of the Presidential Council on Human Rights and Civic Society Institutions. He holds a degree from Moscow State University.


Uncertain World: The war of nerves around Iran

Uncertain World: The Arab Spring in global context

Uncertain World: Russia-United States – minimizing the damage

Uncertain World: Where are all the moral leaders?

Uncertain World: Russia and EU vie for title of most unpredictable

Uncertain World: Destructive Soviet nostalgia

Uncertain World: The never-ending missile defense debate

Uncertain World: The Russian-Georgian war as a turning point

Uncertain World: Russia and Europe: Friends and interests

Uncertain World: Nord Stream and the future of Russian energy policy

Uncertain World: Russia’s WTO entry as the end of the post-Soviet era

Uncertain World: Post-Gaddafi Libya - more questions than answers

Uncertain World: Endgame in Ukraine

Uncertain World: Kiev plays without rules and risks it all

Uncertain World: The secure Eastern Partnership

Uncertain World: Vladimir Putin 3.0

Uncertain World: Post-Soviet inferiority complex

Uncertain World: The EU needs a political goal to survive

Uncertain World: The opportunity that wasn’t

Uncertain World: Why is China silent?

Uncertain World: Russia proposes a new Korean paradigm

Uncertain World: The balance that tripped up America

Uncertain World: Ukraine continues to chase two hares

Uncertain World: Russian lethargy three years after the Russia-Georgia war

Uncertain World: Oslo tragedy as an ill omen

Uncertain World: The reckless West

Uncertain World: Armenia and Azerbaijan’s shaky status quo

Uncertain World: Out of the confusion, conspiracy theories emerge

Uncertain World: Inertia and maneuvering in Russia’s foreign policy season

Uncertain World: Twenty years after the Balkan tragedy

Uncertain World: SCO’s 10 year search for balance

Uncertain World: Epilogue on joint missile defense

Uncertain World: Time for reflection

Uncertain World: Georgia’s risky decision to recognize the Circassian genocide

Uncertain World: Europe after Sofitel

Uncertain World: Pakistan’s vicious circle

Uncertain World: The master of historical byplay

Uncertain World: CSTO must evolve into military alliance

Uncertain World: Arab spring - after the euphoria has faded

Uncertain World: BRICS goes from fantasy to reality

Uncertain World: History and uncertain future spark heated debate

Uncertain World: Those peace-loving Germans

Uncertain World: Putin, Medvedev split over Libya

Uncertain World: In pursuit of common sense

Uncertain World: Vice President Biden’s reconnaissance visit to Moscow

Uncertain World: Yanukovych has boosted Ukraine’s stability – but for how long?

Uncertain World: Learning from Libya and Singapore

Uncertain World: Why don't Russia and Europe need politics to cooperate?

Uncertain World: Russian-Japanese territorial dispute flares up

Uncertain World: Europe without ambitions

Uncertain World: Terrorism’s local roots

Uncertain World: East-West democracy in Tunisia

Uncertain World: Master of intrigue

Uncertain World: Political responses to economic challenges in the next decade

Uncertain World: U.S.-Russian alliance cannot be ruled out

Uncertain World: A troubled year across the former Soviet Union

Uncertain World: Arguments against Russia joining NATO

Uncertain World: Lukashenko set for re-election, not surprisingly

Uncertain World: WikiLeaks document dump to undermine Obama’s clout in Moscow

Uncertain World: Unfinished business - Asia’s troubles rooted in a disputed past

Uncertain World: A quarter-century of going in circles

Uncertain World: The disputed Kuril Islands and Russia’s broader Asian strategy

Uncertain World: Talking Afghanistan without schadenfreude

Uncertain World: Russia’s Asia challenge


To participate in the discussion
log in or register
Заголовок открываемого материала