The Guardian newspaper, a British publication, revealed that Chicago police regularly violated civil rights of Chicago residents by detaining suspects without charges and used harsh interrogation practices. The reporter, Spencer Ackerman, even identified what he called a notorious, Gitmo-like “black site” called Homan Square.
However, defense lawyers and even some victims themselves have argued that the Guardian article is actually too limited and even threatens to narrow the scope. They argue that unlawful detentions, harsh interrogations and even corruption is a systemic, city-wide issue and that Homan Square is far from the only location where these violations occur on a “daily” basis. They also note that such abuses have been going on for decades and are well documented in local media.
Eliza Solowiej, executive director of First Defense Legal Aid which represents indigent clients agreed.
"It's not just this facility. This is a citywide problem," she said.
There were few running to the defense of the CPD after the Guardian articles were published. Those who did respond have mostly argued that the Guardian reporting, if anything, may have obscured how wide the abuse is, giving the city an opportunity to “fix” the issue of Homan Square while leaving the rest of the department unaffected.
“If lawyers have a client detained at Homan Square, just like any other facility, they are allowed to speak to and visit them,” they said in the statement. “It also houses CPD's Evidence Recovered Property Section, where the public is able to claim inventoried property. There are always records of anyone who is arrested by CPD, and this is not any different at Homan Square."
By delaying the recording of the detention, the suspects are often left without communication with their lawyers or family. That means they are effectively “disappeared,” though not for nearly as long as many Gitmo detainees have disappeared for.
Still, the reportage has brought a viral light on the discussion of the many instances in which the Chicago police have violated civil and human rights.