US Senate Ban on Torture Ineffective Without Punishing Abusers

© Flickr / Val KerryThe US Senate amendment prohibiting the use of torture by US officials will remain ineffective if those responsible for torture abuses are not held accountable.
The US Senate amendment prohibiting the use of torture by US officials will remain ineffective if those responsible for torture abuses are not held accountable. - Sputnik International
Subscribe
Prohibition of torture by US military, intelligence and law enforcement personnel may remain ineffective, if abusers are not held accountable.

WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — The US Senate amendment prohibiting the use of torture by US officials will remain ineffective if those responsible for torture abuses are not held accountable, Habeas attorney for Guantanamo Bay detainees Stephen Truitt told Sputnik on Wednesday.

“No law will cure the unwillingness of the executive to prosecute torturers,” Truitt stated. “Until there is such a will to apply the law, whether a prior law or newly enacted law, there will be no responsibility for the conduct.”

Torture Is Wrong - Sputnik International
US Senate Votes to Reaffirm Ban on Torture
On Tuesday, the US Senate approved by a vote of 78 to 21 an amendment that reaffirmed the prohibition on the use of torture by US military, intelligence and law enforcement personnel. Interrogation and detention methods are strictly limited to those outlined in the US Army Field Manual.

Truitt, who is principally responsible for one Guantanamo Bay prisoner and is assisting in three other habeas corpus cases, argued that lack of willingness to hold those accountable for using torture techniques will extend the “free pass” regime.

“Obama’s decision not to prosecute for past torture but to ban future torture only, insures the same evils will be engaged in again,” he said.

The CIA’s “Torture Report” has received much heated criticism, both from human rights activists and from apologists more concerned with national security. - Sputnik International
Sinister CIA Torture May Have Crossed 'Human Experimentation' Threshold
The attorney explained the amendment’s enactment does not provide the essential missing ingredient to eliminate torture, “a willingness of the Executive to prosecute torturers, from the highest supervisors down to the worker bees.”

Truitt stated the need for an amendment prohibiting torture is somewhat unclear because torture is already prohibited by US federal criminal law.

Signatories to the Convention Against Torture, including the United States, “are required to investigate allegations of torture and prosecute them,” he noted.

This Sept. 2009 photo, courtesy of the Center for Constitutional Rights, shows Majid Khan while imprisoned at the U.S. Navy base at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. - Sputnik International
CIA Detainee Reveals Sexual Abuse, Torture Beyond Senate Intel Findings
If signed into law by President Barack Obama, the amendment would codify that torture techniques, previously justified by the US War on Terror, are illegal.

In 2009, Obama issued an Executive Order banning the euphemistically called “enhanced interrogation,” or torture, techniques.

In December 2014, the US Senate released a report outlining the use of torture by the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The practices employed by the CIA against enemy combatants and detainees included waterboarding, questionable medical procedures and other methods that are not defined in the US Army Field Manual.

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала