The plan proposes a five-year 'road map' to Russia's economic sovereignty and long-term growth, and is ostensibly aimed at helping the country to avoid the 'stagflation trap' of economic stagnation and growing inflation. The plan is presented as being aimed toward building up the country's immunity to external shocks and foreign influence, and ultimately, toward bringing Russia out of the periphery and into the core of the global economic system.
The plan's ambitious goals include raising industrial output by 30-35 percent over a five year period, creating a socially-oriented 'knowledge economy' via the transfer of substantial economic resources to education, health care and the social sphere, the creation of instruments aimed at increasing savings as a percent of GDP, and a number of other initiatives, including a program aimed at transitioning to a sovereign monetary policy.
Controversially, the program proposes to use Central Bank resources to provide targeted lending for businesses and industries by providing them with low interest rates between 1-4 percent, made possible by quantitative easing to the tune of 20 trillion rubles over a five year period. The program also suggests that the state support private business through the creation of "reciprocal obligations" for the purchase of products and services at agreed-upon prices.
Another decidedly anti-liberal and arguably even anti-free market proposal in Glazyev's report is a section devoted to the "stabilization of prices," proposing a temporary freeze on prices for a basic basket of consumer goods, a 25 percent profit cap between producer and retail prices, as well as measures to stabilize the price of goods and services provided by state-controlled monopolies. The economist also proposes revoking the return of the VAT on the export of raw materials and resources to state companies, ostensibly aimed at stimulating the export of processed goods.
A section of the report on "the neutralization of the effects of anti-Russian sanctions" proposes converting the reserves of the Russian Central Bank, the Reserve Fund and the National Welfare Fund into gold and BRICS countries bonds, along with the creation of a new regional and international system of settlements in national currencies independent of the dollar. One proposal in particular from this section which caught the ire of critics was the suggestion that Russian companies be permitted to use force majeure to free themselves of obligations related to loan agreements provided in countries which have imposed financial sanctions against Russia.
Program Hits a Nerve Among Russia's Liberal Economists
Upon leaking, Glazyev's proposal was hit with a wave of criticism from representatives of the liberal wing of Russia's economic policy elite, from the 'old guard' of market reformers such as Yevegni Yashin and Andrei Nechayev, to the new generation, including Konstantin Sonin, former Vice Rector of Moscow's Higher School of Economics. Observers criticized the economist's proposals for being an attempt to return the country to the Soviet model of development, with others saying that the program amounted to a proposal to turn the economy into one-part Argentina, one-part North Korea.
An recent op-ed in liberal English-language newspaper The Moscow Times slammed Glazyev's plan, saying that it amounted to "a compendium of lazy, irrational thinking that, were it ever put into practice, would quickly set Russia on a road to economic apocalypse."
So far, Glazyev's plan has merely stepped on some toes within Russia's economic policy establishment. Were it to be taken into serious consideration, it would doubtlessly come to threaten long-established economic and political interests, both in Russia and abroad, serving as a Pandora's box which the Russian leadership does not seem eager to open.
