Truth Censored: US Media Cover President's Barefaced Lies

© Flickr / Jun WangNewsroom
Newsroom - Sputnik International
Subscribe
US media objectivity leaves a lot to be desired, American author Eric Zuesse stresses, adding that a democracy cannot function with such a news media, and actually it does not.

In a recent article for independent Czech online news and opinion journal Svobodne Noviny, columnist Jaromir Petrik explained why he is sick and tired of the media's presentation of Russia as the world's greatest threat to peace, while the US, which has launched a series of aggressive wars across the globe over the last decade, seems to get a pass. - Sputnik International
The Art of Propaganda: Why is Russia Called the Main Threat to World Peace?
In September 2002, then US President George W. Bush claimed that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was creating weapons of mass destruction (WMD), citing the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) "new report."

Years later it turned out George W. Bush was completely wrong, but the truth of the matter is that the US president lied and America's major media outlets were most likely aware of it, US author and investigative historian Eric Zuesse underscores.

"[A] report came out of the IAEA that they were six months away from developing a weapon. I don't know what more evidence we need," Bush claimed, as cited by the author.

However, the IAEA immediately rushed to inform the public that it had not released such a "new report" and that there was no WMD in Iraq.

"The American news media simply ignored the IAEA's denial, and we invaded Iraq, almost six months after that boldfaced lie, a lie the press refused to expose, at all — ever," Zuesse stressed in his article for Strategic Culture Foundation.

Former President George W. Bush - Sputnik International
Wilkerson: There Was No Formal Decision by Bush to Declare War on Iraq
Furthermore, the US media still has not admitted that the president lied. Instead, they have launched a debate on whether or not George W. Bush was misled by "defective US intelligence."

American media outlets have apparently forgotten that Bush cited the IAEA "report", not intelligence sources, Zuesse reminded.

"The American press hides the fact that the American President lied his nation into invading Iraq. The press lies that it was only ‘bad intelligence,' no lying President," the investigative historian noted.

Not much has changed since then. The US media is now narrating that the blatant coup of 2014 in Ukraine was not a US-instigated regime change but a "revolution" and an ultimate victory for democracy.

Needless to say, major American news outlets are actually applying censorship and getting rid of those reporters who try to expose an "inconvenient" truth.

"How can a democracy function with such a news media?" Zuesse asked rhetorically, and added: "It can't. And it doesn't."

"One can report in major American news media that democracy has ended in America, but one can't report that either Bush or Obama lied us into vile invasions, or that the overthrow of Yanukovych was a coup instead of a 'revolution'," the investigative historian remarked.

The American news media is owned by America's aristocracy, and it is the US aristocracy who finances political campaigns and thereby overwhelmingly determines who will end up in office.

"News media is selling minds; it's a form of PR. In a capitalist economy, there is no way to prevent the news business from becoming a branch of the PR-business. The dominance of propaganda over news reporting is inevitable in any type of economic system. That's reality — not 'Adam Smith'," the US author stressed.

Since the American news media is controlled by the national financial and political elites, US media objectivity leaves a lot to be desired.

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала