- Sputnik International
Get the latest news from around the world, live coverage, off-beat stories, features and analysis.

Does the US Sending Troops to Syria Amount to Illegal 'Aggression'?

© AFP 2023 / Saul LOEBUS President Barack Obama speaks during a surprise visit with US troops at Bagram Air Field, north of Kabul, in Afghanistan, May 25, 2014, prior to the Memorial Day holiday
US President Barack Obama speaks during a surprise visit with US troops at Bagram Air Field, north of Kabul, in Afghanistan, May 25, 2014, prior to the Memorial Day holiday - Sputnik International
The Obama administration’s plan to send Special Forces into Syria may not be entirely legal, according to US law. But given the fact that the yearlong coalition air campaign was also never approved by the US Congress, Obama appears to be conducting the same type of aggressive military operations for which he criticized his predecessor.

According to the War Powers Act, the US Congress has 60 days to approve military action. The legislation is in place to prevent any single president from launching wars which may not be in the best interest of the American people.

US Soldiers preparing for a military drill - Sputnik International
Unwelcome Guests: US Military Has No Legal Mandate to Act in Syria

The Obama administration launched the US-led bombing campaign to fight the self-proclaimed Islamic State terrorist group over a year ago. It never came up for a vote.

So while the air campaign may violate international law since it was not welcomed by the Syrian President Bashar al Assad, it also breaches the United States’ own rules about how to conduct combat.

The administration's announcement that it will place US boots on the ground in Syria will move forward in a similar fashion, and, paradoxically, even contradict the White House’s own previous support for Congressional authority.

Throughout the US-led campaign, a number of legislative committees have proposed Authorizations for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) against IS. While the Obama administration has carried on without Congressional approval, it has endorsed a select number of the AUMF proposals.

US Army - Sputnik International
'Offensive War Without Legal Justification' – Ally Slams Obama

But almost all of these explicitly forbid the placement of ground troops in Syria. Meaning everyone, including President Obama, fully recognizes that there is no legal basis for the placement of US forces in Syria.

Following last week’s announcement, the Obama administration has come under fire for its decision, even from those within its own party. Virginia Senator Tim Kaine, who has been one of Obama’s closest allies in the past, came out as being firmly against new troop deployment.

"Many of the decisions they’ve made I strongly support," Kaine told reporters last week, "…but we are kind of going from crisis to crisis."

"We have been waging offensive war which has really been without legal justification," he added.

Syrian officials have also spoken out against the plan. In addition to the fact that Washington will operate without the authority of or coordination with the Syrian government, MP Sharif Shehadeh pointed out American hypocrisy in the decision.

the meeting of Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Syrian counterpart Bashar Assad - Sputnik International
Putin Comes Out on Top in Latest Phase of Geopolitical Chess Game in Syria

"When America sends ground forces into Syrian territories without an agreement with the Syrian government it becomes an intervention and aggression," he told the Associated Press.

"Will America allow Russian ground forces to go into America without an agreement? I think the answer is no."

Obama’s plan calls for the sending of between 30 and 50 US Special Forces "advisers." Claims that the personnel will serve in a purely advisory capacity have already been called into question based on the combat role of similar forces in Iraq.

Washington has also insisted that its efforts will be focused against IS, and not the Syrian government, though the Obama administration has been adamant about its view that Assad must be removed from power.

To participate in the discussion
log in or register
Заголовок открываемого материала