"The United States has been pushing for regime change since 2011 really by hook or by crook, using all means necessary," the expert asserted. "Ultimately, the United States wants [the] destruction of Syria as a state, wants the destruction of Syria as we know it and the removal of Assad as a fundamental part of that."
Afghanistan: ruined Iraq: ruined Libya: ruined Ukraine: ruined Syria: ruined Yemen: ruined ─► Stop US & NATO regime change.
— Oh boy what a shot (@ohboywhatashot) 28 декабря 2015
Initially, Washington's plan involved using rebel groups, like Daesh and al-Nusra Front, to carry out a regime change in Syria. Russia's aerial campaign launched following a formal request from Damascus made this impossible.
"The dirty secret about Obama’s regime change strategy in Syria is that it's a de facto alliance with Al-Qaeda" pic.twitter.com/jGBx1WydMl
— the Lemniscat (@theLemniscat) 31 декабря 2015
"I think any serious political observer would agree that were it not for Russia's involvement in the conflict in Syria, the US would not even be willing to go to Vienna, would not be willing to really take part in a substantive political dialogue," Draitser noted.
This is a welcoming development, which, the analyst expects, will bring at least "temporary peace" to Syria.
"The United States has moved to a secondary option for regime change which is basically using the chaos and war in order to force a political dialogue in which the precondition is the removal of Assad or the so-called transition from Assad's rule," Draitser assumed.
The analyst mentioned that Bashar al-Assad enjoys popular support in Syria, which could be the main reason why Washington does not want him to take part in the US-sponsored elections, expected to be held mid-2017. US policymakers are wary that the Syrian people could well vote for him.
