The High Court case was brought by 94 year-old British-born World War 2 veteran Harry Shindler, who has lived in Italy since 1982, and lawyer Jacquelyn MacLennan, who lives in Belgium, who argued that expats living abroad should be given the chance to vote.
Lawyers vow to fight on after High Court rejects #Brexit challenge https://t.co/CY5mKaNLXh #eureferendum pic.twitter.com/HtyZ1oPD6C
— Leigh Day (@LeighDay_Law) April 28, 2016
Under current law, UK citizens living abroad for more that 15 years are not eligible to vote in any UK elections. The court decided that the UK Government was entitled to adopt a cut-off period "at which extended residence abroad might indicate a weakening of ties with the United Kingdom."
The move is likely to affect around 800,000 expats abroad, who would have been eligible had the pair won their case.
High Court judgment: Shindler and Maclennan (voting in EU referendum) https://t.co/qGV8whMhpF pic.twitter.com/lSolP9sloZ
— Judicial Office (@JudiciaryUK) April 28, 2016
Shindler and MacLennan have vowed to take their case to the Supreme Court, citing the ability of residents of British Overseas Territory of Gibraltar to vote.
Ms MacLennan said the 15 year cutoff was arbitrary.
"If British citizens maintained British citizenship, that brings with it rights, obligations and a connection with this country [and choosing 15 years was] like sticking a dart in a dartboard," she said.
