"Death Statistics alone do not have the necessary psychological impact force. The media have been loyal distribution partners for all terrorists throughout history," Lyster and Midtsund wrote.
According to the Norwegian psychologists, the media coverage drenched with pictures of terror and fears of a world religion could widen the gap between various groups in society.
"Today, people are provided with a creative ‘inner theater' that continually produces imagery of how things can go to hell," they wrote.
Of late, a positive tendency towards self-reflection and restraint has emerged among media sources, as the French TV channel that interviewed the two terrorists while they held hostages in Paris in 2015 was condemned. French media agreed to no longer display pictures of terrorists or give their names in order to prevent their glorification.
According to Lyster and Midtsund, the people's right to information is often used by the media as an excuse to attract attention through sensationalism, which only fuels the public's hypervigilance, where senses only are focused on averting danger, real and imaginary alike.
For Norway, which in 2011 suffered one of the bloodiest mass shootings in history, when 77 people were shot dead by right-wing extremist Anders Behring Breivik, the coverage of terrorist attacks remains a sensitive issue. Earlier, two out of three Norwegians expressed discontent with the excessive way their media addressed the issue of terrorism.