- Sputnik International
World
Get the latest news from around the world, live coverage, off-beat stories, features and analysis.

Defective Combat Helmets Made by US Prisoners Cost Taxpayers Millions

© AP Photo / Ahn Young-joonU.S. and South Korean, left, army soldiers work together to set up a floating bridge on the Hantan river during a river crossing operation, part of an annual joint military exercise between South Korea and the United States
U.S. and South Korean, left, army soldiers work together to set up a floating bridge on the Hantan river during a river crossing operation, part of an annual joint military exercise between South Korea and the United States - Sputnik International
Subscribe
According to a new watchdog report, prison inmates used crude, makeshift tools to fashion faulty Kevlar helmets worn by US troops on the battlefield. Construction implements included a screw shoved through a piece of wood and makeshift hatchets.

Under a government contract, more than 126,000 helmets made at a Texas prison in 2010 were recalled when major defects were discovered by inspectors, according to a report issued Wednesday by the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG). 

$300 Million Failure: US Failed to Build Major Power Plant In Afghanistan - Sputnik International
US Still Lacks Anti-Corruption Strategy in Afghanistan - Inspector General

ArmorSource, the company responsible for the faulty gear, was awarded additional government contracts even as the OIG conducted its probe, although taxpayers and the government lost some $19 million on the unsound helmets. The helmets were made as then-President George W. Bush ordered a US military surge in an effort to beat back Al-Qaeda.

The Department of Defense awarded ArmorSource a $30 million contract in 2006, and construction labor was subcontracted to Federal Prisons Industries (FPI), a program within the Bureau of Prisons that employs inmate labor to produce a wide range of products for the federal government. The report’s summary said that a lack oversight lead to a number of problems in the Beaumont, Texas, program, which has since been deactivated.

Officials at FPI "pre-selected" helmets for quality checks that were supposedly random, but the IG report found that staff instructed inmates to doctor documents "to falsely indicate that helmets passed inspection and met contract specifications." 

The inspector general of the US intelligence community found in a report that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is complying with all classification policies. - Sputnik International
US Intel. Community Classification Not Violating Policies:Inspector General

The report indicated that inspectors from the Defense Contract Management Agency, "did not perform proper inspections, lacked training, and submitted false inspection records wherein they attested that [helmet] lots were inspected when in fact they were not…At least in one instance an inspector certified the lots as being inspected over a fax machine."

The OIG also noted that the provisional tools used by inmates posed a security risk, as they could have brought harm to prison guards. But the federal government awarded ArmorSource a two-year contract worth $92 million in 2013, even as the probe was ongoing.

It was announced in January that ArmorSource would deliver 100,000 lightweight helmets to the Marine Corps, and 105,000 to the US Army this year. This announcement came only two months after the company paid out $3 million in a lawsuit over poorly-made helmets brought by two whistleblowers. 

View of an entrance to the building of headquarters of CIA - Sputnik International
CIA Inspector General Linked to Probe Into Spying on US Senate Resigns

Martin Brackett, an attorney for ArmorSource said that FPI is to blame for the defective helmets, and that the Ohio-based company is no longer affiliated with the program.

"The minute they found out about the misconduct at Federal Prison Industries, they severed their ties. This was the first and last contract [with FPI]."

The lawyer added that ArmorSource paid the settlement so the company could move on. "The company had been having to deal with it for years. They reached a point where they decided they simply wanted to pay and be done with it rather than spending that money and to continue the aggravation of the litigation on it."

Justice Department spokeswoman Nicole Navas wouldn’t comment on the Department’s opinion on the continued awarding of contracts to ArmorSource, pointing out that "the decision whether to award a contract lies with the particular contracting agency."

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала