- Sputnik International
Asia
Find top stories and features from Asia and the Pacific region. Keep updated on major political stories and analyses from Asia and the Pacific. All you want to know about China, Japan, North and South Korea, India and Pakistan, Southeast Asia and Oceania.

Trump's Strike in Afghanistan 'Not Meaningful in Any Strategic Sense'

© AP Photo / Abdul KhaliqIn this July 24, 2016 file photo, a US military personal stands guard during a graduation ceremony for Afghan troops, in Lashkargah, capital of southern Helmand province, Afghanistan.
In this July 24, 2016 file photo, a US military personal stands guard during a graduation ceremony for Afghan troops, in Lashkargah, capital of southern Helmand province, Afghanistan. - Sputnik International
Subscribe
The use of the giant bomb, dubbed the Mother of All Bombs," won't give any strategic advantage to America in Afghanistan, despite US President Trump hailed the attack a great success, military analysts told Sputnik.

WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — The use of a 22,000 pound Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB) bomb, the largest conventional weapon in the US military arsenal, will have no discernible effect in changing the course of the war in Afghanistan.

"The strike on the cave complex in Afghanistan probably killed 150-200 members of the Afghan chapter of the Islamic State [Daesh] terror group (outlawed in Russia). In that sense, it was a modest tactical success," leading tactician and military historian retired US Army Col. Doug Macgregor said on Thursday.

File Photo from US Air Force of the GBU-43 Bomb - Sputnik International
Asia
Trump Proud of Using 'Mother of All Bombs', But It Hardly Can Impact Afghan War
President Donald Trump earlier in the day hailed the use of the MOAB super-bomb against terrorist forces in eastern Afghanistan as a great success.

The MOAB, nicknamed "the Mother of All Bombs," was designed during the second Iraq War and carries a conventional warhead weighing 22,600 pounds (10,300 kg).

However, Macgregor, who commanded US armored units in the Battle of 73 Easting in the 1991 Gulf War, cautioned that the use of the weapon was very unlikely to have any significant strategic impact on the wider direction of the Afghan war.

"Strategically, the strike had no impact on the war in Afghanistan where 40,000 Taliban fighters are regaining the ground lost over the last few years and crushing the US trained — and — equipped Afghan army and police," he pointed out.

Macgregor dismissed the notion that the use of the MOAB could reverse the dire conditions facing the Kabul government and he said the developing collapse in Afghanistan was reminiscent of the 2014 collapse of the Iraqi Army in the face of a determined Daesh assault.

"Thus, the strike is not meaningful in any strategic sense. The only conclusion any reasonable military analyst can reach is that the President is badly advised," he said.

Brookings Institution military analyst Michael O’Hanlon made a similar assessment.

The MOAB is "a weapon without the profound effects often attributed to it by folklore! It’s not that super big and not that super bad," he told Sputnik.

The bomb has been in service in the US military since 2003, but Thursday marked the first time the MOAB was used in a combat action.

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала