‘We’re Not Ready Yet’: What MH17 Investigation Won’t Discuss

© REUTERS / Maxim ZmeyevJournalists attend a news conference, organized by officials of Russian missile manufacturer Almaz-Antey and dedicated to the results of its investigation into Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 crash in eastern Ukraine, in Moscow, Russia, October 13, 2015
Journalists attend a news conference, organized by officials of Russian missile manufacturer Almaz-Antey and dedicated to the results of its investigation into Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 crash in eastern Ukraine, in Moscow, Russia, October 13, 2015 - Sputnik International
The joint investigation team (JIT) that is working on the mystery of downed flight MH17, a Boeing passenger jet, has accused the Russian military of being behind the catastrophe. However, the team once again has avoided the most sensitive questions regarding the investigation.

We know, but we won't tell

"The investigation team examined all images available and determined that the ‘Buk' unit has a number or unique features," Wilbert Paulissen, head of the Dutch Police's National Crime Squad, said Thursday.

"It is determined that the system that shot down the Boeing originated from the 53rd anti-aircraft missile brigade from Kursk in the Russian Federation."

The reconstructed airplane serves as a backdrop during the presentation of the final report into the crash of July 2014 of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 over Ukraine, in Gilze Rijen, the Netherlands, October 13, 2015 - Sputnik International
MH17 Case 'Politicized', Investigators Won’t Release Any Proof – Analyst
The investigation team said it compared dozens of images and came to the conclusion that those "unique features" point towards a Buk missile system owned by a Russian army brigade.

However, they have never shared any of those pictures, nor elaborated what "unique features" they were talking about.

The investigation also says it suspects some 100 people were involved in the launch preparation, but have never published their names.

The investigation team head, the Netherlands' chief prosecutor Fred Westerbeke, said he cannot say who is responsible for this atrocity. Instead, he underscored that the investigation is continuing.

"We have a lot of proof and a lot of evidence, but we are not ready yet," said Westerbeke. "There is still a lot of work to do."

The missile from the past

Another area of extremely muddy waters has to do with the age and model of the missile alleged to have taken down the plane.

One of the pieces of evidence the investigation team invoked was the missile's serial number. According to the JIT, this serial number says this missile "was made in Moscow in 1986."

It should be noted here that 1986 was the last year of production of the original 9М38, according to a 2015 interview with the manufacturer, Almaz-Antey. The company said at the time that the missile was taken out of service in Russia in 2011, replaced by a newer M1 modification, the 9M38M1.

The original 9M38 missile, however, is still being used in Ukraine, Georgia and Egypt.

Wreckage at the crash site of the Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777, outside the village of Grabovo, near Shakhtyorsk, Donetsk Region - Sputnik International
Investigation of MH17 Crash in Ukraine Biased - Russian Foreign Ministry
Curiously enough, H-shaped submunitions typical of the newer 9M38M1 version of the missile were discovered near the crash area — but there are no marks from H-shaped munitions on the plane's fuselage. According to Almaz-Antey, which conducted a simulated experiment in October 2015, the holes on MH17's fuselage were made by cube-shaped submunitions, a dead giveaway for the old 9M38 missile.

The company's simulated explosion experiment resulted in different conclusions than the JIT investigation: it found that the missile that shot down the plane was not a 9M38M1 and that the missile was not fired from the town of Snezhnoye.

According to Almaz-Antey, the JIT also twisted or ignored of information presented by the company during the investigation, including the report on the test fire experiment — this, despite the fact that technical documentation regarding the 9M38 and its 9M38M1 modification was declassified specifically for this investigation.

"We were ready to present both the program and the method of the experiment, but were told ‘thank you very much,' and that was the end of it," Mikhail Malyshevsky, an adviser to the company's head engineer, said in a 2015 interview.

Strange voices

According to the JIT's version of the events, a Russian Buk system was covertly transported to Ukrainian territory just before the event. This was previously shown in a documentary published by the team.

The film refers to a recording of a phone conversation. On the tape, someone says that a Buk is needed to counteract enemy aviation. The JIT has never said whose voice this is, nor has it provided proof that the tape is genuine, nor has it explained how it proves that the Buk was relocated across the Ukrainian border.

To participate in the discussion
log in or register
Заголовок открываемого материала