Chequers Proposal Is Confusing Mess, Not Acceptable to Anyone – Researcher

© Sputnik / Alexey Filippov / Go to the mediabankBritain’s Foreign Minister, Jeremy Hunt said that a risk of a no deal Brexit is rising.
Britain’s Foreign Minister, Jeremy Hunt said that a risk of a no deal Brexit is rising. - Sputnik International
Former UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson has lashed out at Theresa May's Brexit plan, urging her to follow his proposals instead. In an article published in The Daily Telegraph, Mr. Johnson referred to the prime minister's Chequers proposals as “a moral and intellectual humiliation for this country.”

Radio Sputnik discussed Boris Johnson's alternative for Theresa May's proposals with Rodney Atkinson, founder of the website, one of Britain's most successful political economists and a former advisor to ministers.

Sputnik: How would you assess Boris Johnson's alternative for Theresa May's proposals? Could it work out now that the clock for the UK is ticking and would Mrs. May consent to them?

People demonstrate against Brexit on a balcony in London, Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2018, as Britain's Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson delivers a speech focusing on Britain leaving the EU. The Foreign Office says Johnson will use a speech Wednesday to argue for an outward-facing, liberal and global Britain after the U.K. leaves the bloc - Sputnik International
Ex-Brexit Secretary Davis to Vote Against Chequers, Says Proposal 'Just Wrong'
Rodney Atkinson: I think that it's quite right. The Chequers proposal is a humiliation and a confusing mess. It's not acceptable logically, it's not acceptable to the British people or the Parliament, it wouldn't get through, and it's not acceptable to the European Union. Boris Johnson is coming up with an alternative which is logical and coherent.

But there's one part to it which seems to me a bit confused and that is where he says that we would agree on an exit fee on leaving and then there would be an agreement and the intention to negotiate a Canada-style free trade agreement. Of course, that is the wrong way around; we couldn't do it that way because they would take our money and in the end, we wouldn't get a trade deal.

So, obviously, the commitment must be to finalize a trade deal and then the exit fee would be paid. But apart from that, it is a refreshing change.

READ MORE: Anti-Brexit Protest: People March in Birmingham Amid Tory Conference (PHOTO)

Sputnik: There is a six-point plan that he has outlined; I believe that there is also something about resolving the issue with Ireland. What can you say about the Irish border issue?

Rodney Atkinson: There's no doubt there're solutions. I mean, at the moment there is an Irish border, there are checks of various kinds and there are big differences between the North and the South in terms of taxation and duties, income tax, VAT rates and so on. There're lots of differences and we manage perfectly well without a specific border post with gendarmerie of any sort.

And also nowadays trade is conducted through trade facilitation agreements, which make it a lot easier with modern technology not to have to check trade at the border. So, there's no problem there. Indeed, at various times both the Irish and the British inland revenues have pointed out that it shouldn't be necessary to have a hard borer.

Recently, I think, Barnier himself has said that he's going to make more proposals to make that possible. Of course, the Irish would want the European Union to make the border as clear and open as possible. I don't see that as a sort of blocking idea, but it's not a credible problem in the long run.

Britain's Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union Dominic Raab delivers his keynote address to the Conservative Party Conference in Birmingham, Britain, October 1, 2018. - Sputnik International
EU Won’t Bully Us With Economic Embargo Threat, Brexit Sec Confirms No Deal Prep
Sputnik: What do you make of the timing of Johnson's six-point plan? It seems that Chequers has been out for quite a while, he's been opposed to it since it was announced and now he has come up with the six-point plan ripping up the arrangement which gives Brussels the perpetual right to the economic annexation of Northern Ireland if rules diverge, use the two-year post-Brexit transition phase to put out a trade deal based on the one struck between Canada and Brussels.

The other point is to launch practical preparations to operate our own trade and immigration policy; one of the things in there, I think number five, is "accelerate no-deal preparations in case of a breakdown in the talks." We're still coming back to this no-deal; why did he do this now and not earlier? Would he even have time to try to implement this? Would Brussels have this?

Rodney Atkinson: First of all, there's no such thing as "no deal" — we go automatically to a WTO deal. Secondly, he has been saying these sorts of things; he hasn't suddenly come up with this. This is the most comprehensive and detailed thing that has been put before his own party and the public, but there have been various proposals by economic institutes and others that he has been associated with.

READ MORE: More Expensive Than Expected: Brexit Costs UK £500Mln Per Week — Report

Of course, he was right to say that the Chequers deal, which gives control over our industrial and agricultural regulation, provides this backstop for Northern Ireland which is constitutionally unacceptable, the £40 billion fee without any guarantee of a free trade agreement and restrictions on our social and environmental law.

So, all these things in Chequers are a contradiction of what Mrs. May said not long ago that she wanted, which was control over our own economy, borders and our own constitutional rights.

The views expressed in the article are those of Rodney Atkinson, and do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.

To participate in the discussion
log in or register
Заголовок открываемого материала