"I said, ‘Let's do this like corporate America.' I shook his hand and said, ‘The elevators will be ready when she pulls out, or you can fire me,'" Spencer says he told US President Donald Trump at the Army-Navy football game on December 8, 2018. At the time, the Ford, the most expensive ship ever built for the US Navy, had only one of its 11 new high-tech weapons elevators operating.
July has come and gone, and now only two of the 11 elevators, needed to move munitions from the bowels of the ship up to the flight deck where they can be mounted on aircraft, are functioning.
“Essentially, the ship can’t deploy,” Rep. Elaine Luria (D-VA) told Bloomberg in an interview for a July 31 article. “It can’t carry ammunition.”
“I don’t see an end in sight right now,” she said. The Ford was built In Luria’s district, at the Huntington Ingalls shipyard in Hampton Roads, and Luria herself is a 20-year veteran of Navy surface warfare operations.
The weapons elevators, like the Ford’s EMALS catapult for launching aircraft off the flight deck, are of a new design compared to the Nimitz-class ships the Ford and its kin will replace: they both use magnets instead of more tried-and-true methods like steam pressure and cables.
Trump, not a Navy man, nonetheless captured the feelings of many when he derided the troubled EMALS system as something "you have to be Albert Einstein" to work properly. Still, it’s more efficient than the old steam-powered CATOBAR catapults used since the mid-20th century when it’s functioning as it ought - something an internal Pentagon report admitted is unlikely.
When working correctly, the elevators can lift as much as 24,000 pounds of ordnance at 150 feet per minute, which is much faster than cable-based lifts on the Nimitz-class carriers. But right now it looks as if the Ford won’t have all its weapons elevators working even by the time of its delayed delivery in October.
Vice Adm. Michael Gilday told the Senate Armed Services Committee on Wednesday the elevators hadn’t been “prototyped ashore” like other new tech on the ship because the engineers early in the program “did not consider the elevator system to be high risk,” USNI reported.
“The remaining nine elevators, not turned over to the crew, are in various levels of construction to ensure the remaining doors and hatches can repeatably operate per required specification,” Navy spokesperson Capt. Danny Hernandez told Bloomberg.
He noted that 70 elevator shaft doors and 17 hatches don’t meet design specifications.
Luria said fixing the elevators is “a very time-intensive process of alignment where things are welded on” and have to be cut off and rewelded and realigned. “I think they have the technology and capability to do it, it’s just incredibly time-consuming to do this for nine more elevators.”
The Ford is already well over budget and behind schedule. It was expected to be delivered in July 2017 and is at least 20% over expected costs. Still, despite these shortcomings, the Navy signed a contract on January 31 for two more of the gigantic ships from Huntington Ingalls for $14.9 billion. The Project on Government Oversight watchdog group called the deal "acquisition insanity,” Sputnik reported.
“Ultimately,” Gilday was forced to concede to lawmakers Wednesday, the cost overruns and delays are “a failure of the Navy.”
