- Sputnik International
World
Get the latest news from around the world, live coverage, off-beat stories, features and analysis.

‘Intentions Remain Unclear’: US Committee Publishes Report on ‘Russian Meddling’ in 2016 Elections

© Photo : US Senate Intelligence CommitteeSenate Intelligence Committee Report on Alleged Russian Meddling in 2016 Elections
Senate Intelligence Committee Report on Alleged Russian Meddling in 2016 Elections - Sputnik International
Subscribe
The two-volume document makes bold allegations but does not provide proof. The authors also cannot explain the intentions of the purported attackers. Moscow has already provided an official comment on the report.

On Tuesday, the US Senate Committee on Intelligence published a two-part report alleging that Russia meddled in the 2016 US presidential elections.

The first volume focuses on allegations that Russia probed the US online voting infrastructure, while the second focuses on allegations that Russia used social media to sow chaos among the American public.

Both documents are heavily redacted, and at times entire chapters are blacked out. The unredacted sections claim but fail to prove allegations that Russia, the Kremlin, the elusive Internet Research Agency or Russian catering tycoon Evgeniy Prigozhin are involved in any coordinated attacks against US election infrastructure.

The first volume of the report explicitly notes that “Russian intentions regarding US election infrastructure remain unclear.” 

© Photo : Senate Intelligence CommitteeSenate Intelligence Committee Report on Alleged Russian Meddling in 2016 Elections // Photo / US Senate Intelligence Committee
‘Intentions Remain Unclear’: US Committee Publishes Report on ‘Russian Meddling’ in 2016 Elections - Sputnik International
Senate Intelligence Committee Report on Alleged Russian Meddling in 2016 Elections // Photo / US Senate Intelligence Committee

According to the document, a foreign attacker – which the document insists without proof was Russia - conducted what can be described as a probe of US election servers. 

Dr. Samuel Liles, Acting Director of the Cyber Division of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis at the Department of Homeland Security, describes the attacks as "simple scanning for vulnerabilities, analogous to somebody walking down the street and looking to see if you are home.”

“A small number of systems were unsuccessfully exploited, as though somebody had rattled the doorknob but was unable to get in,” he says. “[However] a small number of the networks were successfully exploited. They made it through the door."

The document also states explicitly that, in the aftermath of those attacks, “no evidence that vote tallies were altered,” as well as no “voter registry files were deleted or modified.”

The second volume of the report offers a detailed description of alleged Russian operations in the social media. This section relies heavily on reports in US and Russian media - primarily, The New York Times - as base for the allegations.

According to the report, Russia employed the Internet Research Agency (IRA) to create innumerable fake accounts that posed as US citizens and conducted normal social media activity, only to intertwine it with engineered textual political “payloads.”

The document says the social media project was not intended to persuade US citizens of one narrative, but to create conflicting narratives to the point where social media users would get either increasingly polarized or simply refrain from participating in online discussion. While the main goal is said to be sowing discord and general chaos among the American public, the document also claims the campaign sought to influence the 2016 elections. 

© Photo : Senate Intelligence CommitteeSenate Intelligence Committee Report on Alleged Russian Meddling in 2016 Elections // Photo / US Senate Intelligence Committee
‘Intentions Remain Unclear’: US Committee Publishes Report on ‘Russian Meddling’ in 2016 Elections - Sputnik International
Senate Intelligence Committee Report on Alleged Russian Meddling in 2016 Elections // Photo / US Senate Intelligence Committee

The report claims that IRA social media accounts targeted not only the 2016 Dem nominee, Hillary Clinton, but other candidates – both Democratic and Republican – including Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio. The report claims that trolls were instructed to favor two candidates: Donald Trump and, tellingly, Bernie Sanders.

The document claims the entire operation was created and managed by Yevgeniy Prigozhin, a Russian restaurant and catering tycoon with alleged close ties to President Vladimir Putin. However, no factual base for the allegations is provided. 

Russian online media – in particular, RT and Sputnik – are also said by the US to be part of a scheme to combine “covert hacking and dissemination operations, social media operations, and fake personas with more overt influence platforms.” The report credits RT with being the first “self-described ‘news channel’ to break 1 billion views on YouTube.” 

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov commented on the reports Tuesday.

“There is nothing new [in these documents],” he said. “It’s a relapse of old things.”

On 18 April, the US Special Counsel Robert Mueller presented a report on a two-year investigation into the Trump campaign. In his report, he said he had found no evidence of collusion between the presidential candidate or members of his campaign with Russia – allegations that Democrats repeated following Trump’s inauguration. Moscow has consistently denied involvement in the 2016 US elections.

On 2 October, Putin sarcastically noted that Russia would meddle in the upcoming 2020 elections. 

“Just don’t tell anyone,” Putin stated publicly, before a large audience.

In recent years, Russia has repeatedly been accused of various wrongdoings ranging from the poisoning of former Russian intelligence officer Sergei Skripal to "using subversive measures to weaken the credibility of America's commitment to Europe" (per USAID's CMKI framework). In all cases, no substantial proof has been presented and Moscow has time and time again denied its alleged involvement in sinister schemes.

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала