https://sputnikglobe.com/20220417/durham-says-cia-found-clinton-campaign-lawyers-data-alleging-trump-russia-links-not-plausible--1094825862.html
Durham Says CIA Found Clinton Campaign Lawyer’s Data Alleging Trump-Russia Links ‘Not Plausible’
Durham Says CIA Found Clinton Campaign Lawyer’s Data Alleging Trump-Russia Links ‘Not Plausible’
Sputnik International
Since 2019, Special Counsel John Durham has been investigating the legality of the FBI probe, officially known as "Crossfire Hurricane", into allegations of... 17.04.2022, Sputnik International
2022-04-17T06:00+0000
2022-04-17T06:00+0000
2022-04-17T08:20+0000
us
john durham
donald trump
hillary clinton
christopher steele
https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/107737/57/1077375737_0:719:2048:1871_1920x0_80_0_0_395f051d948193efbc65563683de1b20.jpg
The latest filing from Special Counsel John Durham has revealed that in early 2017, the CIA concluded that evidence purportedly linking former President Donald Trump to Russia provided by Hillary Clinton’s campaign lawyer, Michael Sussmann, was “not technically plausible” and the allegations were untrue.While John Durham does not specifically name the agency, it was earlier confirmed that Michael Sussmann met with the CIA around that time, Fox News reported.In his filing, Durham was responding to objections from Sussmann’s defence regarding evidence that could be admissible at Sussmann's trial, beginning on 16 May.Sussmann has been charged with one count of lying to then-FBI General Counsel James Baker during a September 2016 meeting - less than two months before the presidential election - about then-candidate Donald Trump's potential ties to Russia.Durham's original indictment claims that Sussmann had stated he was not doing work "for any client" when he presented "purported data and 'white papers' that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel" between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank. In fact, he had been presenting the dug up “dirt” on behalf of the Hillary Clinton campaign.The allegations of Trump-Russia links eventually turned out to be unsubstantiated. While Trump denounced the FBI's Russiagate probe as the "crime of the century", Moscow denied any attempts to meddle in US domestic affairs during the 2016 election.Ahead of his trial next month, Michael Sussmann has been trying to throw out evidence related to the gathering of Domain Name System (DNS) data by a tech executive, identified as Rodney Joffe, who worked with the Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer. Defence attorneys for Sussmann claim the data is irrelevant to their client’s charges.However, John Durham argued in the filing, posted Saturday, that the DNS evidence is “a necessary factual backdrop to the charged conduct” that will serve to prove the “existence of the defendant’s attorney-client relationships with” Joffe and the Hillary Clinton campaign.The special counsel added that the information would also reveal how the FBI and CIA used government resources to probe Sussmann’s claims without being aware that it came from a rival political campaign.Durham ProbeJohn Durham was appointed in 2019 to determine if the FBI’s inquiry into the allegations of Donald Trump's "collusion" with Moscow ahead of the 2016 US presidential election was legal. The probe kicked off when then-Attorney General William Barr told the special counsel to lead a review into the Russiagate probe after the US Justice Department released a redacted version of then-Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report.The latter summarised the outcome of his own probe into allegations of the Trump-Russia collusion and Moscow's alleged interference in the 2016 US election. Mueller’s investigation found insufficient evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.Thus, as part of John Durham’s current investigation, it was revealed in February that Domain Name System traffic had been “exploited” by Sussmann and Joffe to dig up dirt on then-Republican presidential hopeful by hacking into "a particular healthcare provider, Trump Tower, Donald Trump's Central Park West apartment building, and the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP)".According to Durham, his investigation has focused on the connection between Sussmann and the discredited anti-Trump dossier authored by ex-British Intelligence agent Christopher Steele and commissioned by opposition research firm Fusion GPS.Furthermore, the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign funded the anti-Trump dossier through law firm Perkins Coie.In his court filing, the special counsel says that Michael Sussmann met in the summer of 2016 with Christopher Steele at the Perkins Coie offices to tell him about the Alfa Bank allegations. After the encounter, staff from the "US Investigative Firm" (identified as Fusion GPS by a Fox News report), tasked Steele to "research and produce intelligence reports" about Alfa Bank, "which he did".Durham asserts that Sussmann "represented and worked for the Clinton campaign in connection with its broader opposition research efforts" and "took steps to integrate" the Alfa Bank allegations "into those opposition research efforts".According to Durham, the evidence is "highly probative" as establishing that Sussmann "represented and worked for the Clinton campaign with its broader opposition research efforts".While Sussmann’s defence has sought to obtain immunity to Tech Executive 1 (Rodney Joffe), according to John Durham’s filing, Joffe is "a subject" of the investigation and has been since prior to Sussmann’s 2021 indictment.John Durham revealed that the trial would see the government offer redacted, non-privileged documents containing communications between Sussmann and Joffe as well as redacted billing records reflecting Sussmann’s work "on behalf of the Clinton campaign" and Joffe.To date, John Durham has indicted three people as part of his investigation, Michael Sussmann in September 2021, Igor Danchenko in November 2021, and Kevin Clinesmith in August 2020.Danchenko is accused of lying to the FBI regarding the source of information provided by him to Christopher Steele for the anti-Trump dossier.Kevin Clinesmith was similarly charged with making a false statement.
https://sputnikglobe.com/20220406/durham-probe-new-damning-evidence-against-clinton-campaign-lawyer--joint-venture-allegations-1094528140.html
https://sputnikglobe.com/20220209/trump-expects-durham-to-fully-expose-fbis-russiagate-probe-as-crime-of-the-century-1092887062.html
https://sputnikglobe.com/20220405/durham-reportedly-plans-to-introduce-steele-dossier-during-trial-of-hillary-clinton-campaign-lawyer-1094503468.html
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
2022
News
en_EN
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
us, john durham , donald trump, hillary clinton, christopher steele
us, john durham , donald trump, hillary clinton, christopher steele
Durham Says CIA Found Clinton Campaign Lawyer’s Data Alleging Trump-Russia Links ‘Not Plausible’
06:00 GMT 17.04.2022 (Updated: 08:20 GMT 17.04.2022) Since 2019, Special Counsel John Durham has been investigating the legality of the FBI probe, officially known as "Crossfire Hurricane", into allegations of Donald Trump colluding with Russia, which turned out to be unsubstantiated. Durham has since indicted three people, one of whom is Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann.
The latest filing from
Special Counsel John Durham has revealed that in early 2017, the CIA concluded that evidence purportedly linking former President Donald Trump to Russia provided by Hillary Clinton’s campaign lawyer, Michael Sussmann, was “not technically plausible” and the allegations were untrue.
“Agency 2 concluded in early 2017 that Russian Bank 1 data and Russian Phone Provider 1 data was not ‘technically plausible’, did not ‘withstand technical scrutiny’, ‘contained gaps’, ‘conflicted with [itself]’, and was ‘user-created and not machine/tool generated’”, Durham stated in the court filing.
While
John Durham does not specifically name the agency, it was earlier confirmed that Michael Sussmann met with the CIA around that time, Fox News reported.
In his filing, Durham was responding to objections from Sussmann’s defence regarding evidence that could be admissible at Sussmann's trial, beginning on 16 May.
Sussmann has been charged with one count of lying to then-FBI General Counsel James Baker during a September 2016 meeting - less than two months before the presidential election - about then-candidate Donald Trump's potential ties to Russia.
Durham's original indictment claims that Sussmann had stated he was not doing work "for any client" when he presented "purported data and 'white papers' that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel" between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank. In fact, he had been presenting the dug up “dirt” on behalf of the Hillary Clinton campaign.
The
allegations of Trump-Russia links eventually turned out to be unsubstantiated. While Trump
denounced the FBI's Russiagate probe as the "crime of the century", Moscow denied any attempts to meddle in US domestic affairs during the 2016 election.
Ahead of his trial next month, Michael Sussmann has been trying to throw out
evidence related to the gathering of Domain Name System (DNS) data by a tech executive, identified as Rodney Joffe, who worked with the Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer. Defence attorneys for Sussmann claim the data is irrelevant to their client’s charges.
However, John Durham argued in the filing, posted Saturday, that the DNS evidence is “a necessary factual backdrop to the charged conduct” that will serve to prove the “existence of the defendant’s attorney-client relationships with” Joffe and the Hillary Clinton campaign.
The special counsel added that the information would also reveal how the FBI and CIA used government resources to probe Sussmann’s claims without being aware that it came from a rival political campaign.
“Evidence concerning the steps the FBI and Agency-2 took to investigate these matters is critical to establishing materiality because it will enable the jury to evaluate those steps, which, in turn, will inform their conclusions about whether the defendant’s alleged false statements were material and could tend to influence or impair government functions”, John Durham wrote.
John Durham was appointed in 2019 to determine if the FBI’s inquiry into the allegations of Donald Trump's "collusion" with Moscow ahead of the 2016 US presidential election was legal. The probe kicked off when then-Attorney General William Barr told the special counsel to lead a review into the Russiagate probe after the US Justice Department released a redacted version of then-Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report.
9 February 2022, 17:21 GMT
The latter summarised the outcome of his own probe into allegations of the Trump-Russia collusion and Moscow's alleged interference in the 2016 US election. Mueller’s investigation found insufficient evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.
Thus, as part of John Durham’s current investigation, it was revealed in February that Domain Name System traffic had been “exploited” by Sussmann and Joffe to dig up dirt on then-Republican presidential hopeful by
hacking into "a particular healthcare provider, Trump Tower, Donald Trump's Central Park West apartment building, and the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP)".
According to Durham, his investigation has focused on the connection between Sussmann and the discredited anti-Trump dossier authored by ex-British Intelligence agent Christopher Steele and commissioned by opposition research firm Fusion GPS.
Furthermore, the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign funded the anti-Trump dossier through law firm Perkins Coie.
In his court filing, the special counsel says that Michael Sussmann met in the summer of 2016 with Christopher Steele at the Perkins Coie offices to tell him about the Alfa Bank allegations. After the encounter, staff from the "US Investigative Firm" (identified as Fusion GPS by a Fox News report), tasked Steele to "research and produce intelligence reports" about Alfa Bank, "which he did".
Durham asserts that Sussmann "represented and worked for the Clinton campaign in connection with its broader opposition research efforts" and "took steps to integrate" the Alfa Bank allegations "into those opposition research efforts".
According to Durham, the evidence is "highly probative" as establishing that Sussmann "represented and worked for the Clinton campaign with its broader opposition research efforts".
"The fact that FBI headquarters received on the same date both sets of information involving the same political campaign (Clinton campaign), the same law firm [Perkins Coie] and the same investigative firm [Fusion GPS] makes Steele’s involvement in these matters relevant", Durham said.
While Sussmann’s defence has sought to obtain immunity to Tech Executive 1 (Rodney Joffe), according to John Durham’s filing, Joffe is "a subject" of the investigation and has been since prior to Sussmann’s 2021 indictment.
John Durham revealed that the trial would see the government offer redacted, non-privileged documents containing communications between Sussmann and Joffe as well as redacted billing records reflecting Sussmann’s work "on behalf of the Clinton campaign" and Joffe.
To date, John Durham has indicted three people as part of his investigation, Michael Sussmann in September 2021, Igor Danchenko in November 2021, and Kevin Clinesmith in August 2020.
Danchenko is accused of lying to the FBI regarding the source of information provided by him to Christopher Steele for the
anti-Trump dossier.
Kevin Clinesmith was similarly charged with making a false statement.
