https://sputnikglobe.com/20220818/us-judge-rules-partial-release-of-fbis-mar-a-lago-affidavit-ok-gives-doj-one-week-pick-redactions--1099741586.html
US Judge Rules Partial Release of FBI's Mar-a-Lago Affidavit OK, Gives DoJ One Week for Redactions
US Judge Rules Partial Release of FBI's Mar-a-Lago Affidavit OK, Gives DoJ One Week for Redactions
Sputnik International
The former president's supporters view the FBI raid as a ploy to prevent him from running for president in 2024 since it occurred amid rumors that Trump may... 18.08.2022, Sputnik International
2022-08-18T21:55+0000
2022-08-18T21:55+0000
2022-08-18T21:54+0000
americas
us
donald trump
mar-a-lago
fbi
fbi agents
raid
judge
https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07e6/08/12/1099742545_0:0:3073:1728_1920x0_80_0_0_92aaa74f89320abf1bf34fb85e0688c2.jpg
A US federal judge on Thursday announced he would make public at least a portion of the affidavit outlining the evidence that prompted the FBI to search former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago home, the Wall Street Journal reported.US Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart stated, "I'm not prepared to find that the affidavit should be fully sealed," and provided the Justice Department with a week to determine which details should be kept confidential.Before the records are made available to the public, Judge Reinhart said he would evaluate the suggested redactions and allow the government the opportunity to appeal his decision on which ones were appropriate.During the hearing, a Justice Department official was concerned that unsealing the affidavit would jeopardize the ongoing investigation into the former president's handling of classified information.The ruling recognized the possibility of certain redactions while striking a balance between the Justice Department's request to keep the whole document sealed and news media organizations' desire for the information to be made public. Despite the Justice Department's efforts to keep the document sealed due to the "highly classified material" it contains, the Associated Press, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, the broadcast TV networks, CNN, and other media outlets pleaded with Judge Reinhart to do so, as "the matter is one of utmost public interest, involving the actions of current and former government officials," per one of the attorneys.The document purportedly contains information on how the FBI obtained probable cause for their search, which resulted in them removing more than twenty boxes from the estate, including eleven sets of classified documents, some of which were reportedly marked top secret. It also is said to detail the evidence the government had gathered, including any testimony from witnesses, and explains why investigators think a crime may have been committed.The controversial search that took place on August 8 sparked a ferocious political backlash, with allies of the former president and Republican politicians accusing the Justice Department of overreaching. The former president referred to the search as a break-in, demanded the release of the unedited affidavit, and called for the judge overseeing the case to step aside in a message on his social media page on Tuesday. Judge Reinhart did reportedly withdraw from a racketeering case Trump filed earlier this year against the Democratic National Committee, Hillary Clinton, and others over their allegations that his campaign had collaborated with Russia without providing a justification.Officials from the Justice Department have defended the Mar-a-Lago search as a necessary action that US Attorney General Merrick Garland only authorized after several weeks of consideration. A list of items confiscated from the property by FBI agents, which was released earlier, revealed that they took boxes of various items, photo albums, a handwritten message, and Roger Stone's executive pardon. According to the three-page list, they also took information regarding the French president. The list is included in a seven-page document that also has a judge-signed search warrant for the property.
https://sputnikglobe.com/20220815/how-fbis-raid-gave-boost-to-trump-reinvigorated-gop-base-ahead-of-midterms-1099627768.html
https://sputnikglobe.com/20220817/fbi-mar-a-lago-raid-likely-to-boost-trumps-comeback-campaign---experts-1099678245.html
americas
mar-a-lago
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rosiya Segodnya“
2022
News
en_EN
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rosiya Segodnya“
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rosiya Segodnya“
us, donald trump, mar-a-lago, fbi, fbi agents, raid, judge
us, donald trump, mar-a-lago, fbi, fbi agents, raid, judge
US Judge Rules Partial Release of FBI's Mar-a-Lago Affidavit OK, Gives DoJ One Week for Redactions
Kirill Kurevlev
Managing Editor
The former president's supporters view the FBI raid as a ploy to prevent him from running for president in 2024 since it occurred amid rumors that Trump may announce his new bid soon. There are also rumors the raid had something to do with the ongoing Capitol riot investigation.
A US federal judge on Thursday announced he would make public at least a portion of the affidavit outlining the evidence that prompted the FBI to search former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago home, the Wall Street Journal
reported.US Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart stated, "I'm not prepared to find that the affidavit should be fully sealed," and provided the Justice Department with a week to determine which details should be kept confidential.
According to the report, the judge declared that, in his opinion, "there are portions of this affidavit that can be unsealed" after carefully reading it "many times."
Before the records are made available to the public, Judge Reinhart said he would evaluate the suggested redactions and allow the government the opportunity to appeal his decision on which ones were appropriate.
During the hearing, a Justice Department official
was concerned that unsealing the affidavit would jeopardize the ongoing investigation into the former president's handling of classified information.
"This is going to be a considered, careful process, where everybody’s rights, the government’s and the media’s, will be protected," the judge stated.
15 August 2022, 18:59 GMT
The ruling recognized the possibility of certain redactions while striking a balance between the Justice Department's request to keep the whole document sealed and news media organizations' desire for the information to be made public.
Despite the Justice Department's efforts to keep the document sealed due to the "highly classified material" it contains, the Associated Press, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, the broadcast TV networks, CNN, and other media outlets pleaded with Judge Reinhart to do so, as "the matter is one of utmost public interest, involving the actions of current and former government officials," per
one of the attorneys.The document purportedly contains information on how the FBI obtained probable cause for their search, which resulted in them removing more than twenty boxes from the estate, including eleven sets of classified documents, some of which were reportedly marked top secret.
It also is said to detail the evidence the government
had gathered, including any testimony from witnesses, and explains why investigators think a crime may have been committed.
The controversial search that took place on August 8 sparked a ferocious political backlash, with allies of the former president and Republican politicians accusing the Justice Department of overreaching.
The former president referred to the search as a break-in, demanded the release of the unedited affidavit, and called for the judge overseeing the case to step aside in a message on his
social media page on Tuesday.
Judge Reinhart did
reportedly withdraw from a racketeering case Trump filed earlier this year against the Democratic National Committee, Hillary Clinton, and others over their allegations that his campaign had collaborated with Russia without providing a justification.
Officials from the Justice Department have defended the Mar-a-Lago search as a necessary action that US Attorney General Merrick Garland only authorized after several weeks of consideration. A list of items confiscated from the property by FBI agents, which was
released earlier, revealed that they
took boxes of various items, photo albums, a handwritten message, and Roger Stone's executive pardon. According to the three-page list, they also took information regarding the French president.
The list is included in a seven-page document that also has a judge-signed search warrant for the property.
17 August 2022, 02:03 GMT
