Animals With Toxic 'Forever Chemicals' Found on Every Continent But Antarctica, Shocking Study Says
© AP Photo / Romas DabrukasA polar bear stands on an ice floe near the Norwegian archipelago of Svalbard. File photo
© AP Photo / Romas Dabrukas
Subscribe
Eating freshwater fish caught in US lakes and rivers once a year amounts to a month of consuming drinking water containing "forever chemicals," a study by US nonprofit the Environmental Working Group (EWG) warned in January.
Traces of what are also referred to as "forever chemicals" were identified in the blood of animals after an in-depth study of more than 100 recent peer-reviewed studies of PFAS contamination by the Environmental Working Group (EWG).
"Likely anywhere you test for these compounds, you will find them. I think that was what is so shocking,” David Andrews, a senior scientist at the group who contributed to the report, was cited as saying.
The “sobering” findings offer a list of wildlife ranging from tiny ticks and plankton, to Siberian tigers, polar bears, wild boar, horses, dogs, and oysters - you name it.
"It has taken six decades of research on humans to really understand how these chemicals impact our biology in so many different ways … and there’s no reason to believe those same impacts are not also occurring in wildlife,” Andrews added.
© AP Photo / Robert F. BukatyA white-tailed deer in woods in Freeport, Maine, as wildlife agencies find elevated levels of PFAS chemicals in game animals, prompting new restrictions on hunting and fishing in some parts of the US.
A white-tailed deer in woods in Freeport, Maine, as wildlife agencies find elevated levels of PFAS chemicals in game animals, prompting new restrictions on hunting and fishing in some parts of the US.
© AP Photo / Robert F. Bukaty
PFAS compounds earned the nickname “forever chemicals” due to their resistance to breaking down in nature or in the human body. Accordingly, they can accumulate over long periods of time, remaining permanently in the air, soil, water, and in the body. A plethora of studies has shown that this can lead to cancer and cause negative reproductive, developmental, cardiovascular, liver, and immunological effects. Extensive use of these chemicals in industrial manufacturing dates back to the 1940s, often to make products water-resistant.
There has been ample US federal data showing that traces of the compounds can be identified in the blood of nearly all Americans, but until now, there has been limited research focusing on wildlife.
The EWG analysis aggregated what previous studies had been carried out into the matter to assemble a map of their findings in animals around the world. About 120 kinds of PFAS were found, with some of the affected species already at risk of extinction, said senior scientist Tasha Stoiber of the EWG.
© Photo : TwitterScreenshot of Twitter account of David Andrews, a senior scientist with the Environmental Working Group (EWG),
Screenshot of Twitter account of David Andrews, a senior scientist with the Environmental Working Group (EWG),
© Photo : Twitter
In January, the EWG cited testing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Food and Drug Administration as showing that consuming "a single meal of freshwater fish could lead to similar PFAS exposure as ingesting store-bought fish every day for a year."
The EWG found that the median amount of PFAS in freshwater fish was 280 times greater than the forever chemicals detected in some commercially caught and sold fish, adding in its news release that such high levels of the compounds "may be harmful."
The researchers involved in the latest study voiced hope that their findings would feed into the urgency of restricting PFAS pollution.
“Human health and animal health are connected. What affects humans is going to affect animals as well, and vice versa. I think that’s another important takeaway overall,” Tasha Stoiber said.