Russia Is Ready to Counter US Plans for ‘Satellite Jammers’ in Space
CC BY-SA 4.0 / José Furtado / Artist's rendering of a Russian Canopus-B satellite in Earth orbit.
![Artist's rendering of a Russian Canopus-B satellite in Earth orbit. Artist's rendering of a Russian Canopus-B satellite in Earth orbit. - Sputnik International, 1920, 21.07.2024](https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/107163/04/1071630487_0:0:2997:1685_1920x0_80_0_0_fa3666ed89fd657bd4997e6e0481b35d.jpg)
Subscribe
The new “satellite jammers” the US intends to deploy in space to target Russian and Chinese satellites are meant to deprive Moscow and Beijing of “command, control, communication and intelligence systems during times of conflict,” said Bruce Gagnon, coordinator at Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space.
According to him, these US jammers are “intended as offensive weapons” and got “nothing to do with defense whatsoever.”
The United States development of this jammer tech, however, “is forcing Russia and China to develop similar technologies,” Gagnon added.
“And in the case of Russia, I know they're developing ways to block these jammers, to counter these jammers,” he said. “So this is all leading to the rise or the increase or the growth of tensions, escalation of warfare capabilities and space.”
Gagnon also observed that this development takes place as the US “refuses to have a treaty to ban weapons in space,” which effectively forced Russia, China and India to pursue the development of “kinetic energy anti-satellite weapons.”
“For at least 25 years, Russia and China have gone to the United Nations General Assembly and introduced a treaty to prevent all weapons in space,” he lamented, noting that US and Israel “blocked this development of this treaty for more than 25 years” when it was brought to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva.
Meanwhile, Alexander Mikhailov, head of Russian think tank Bureau of Military-Political Analysis, argued that US move to deploy satellite jammers in space suggest that Washington’s previous attempt to establish a ground-based satellite jamming system was unsuccessful.
Not only did that previous scheme required considerable investments into new jamming facilities on the ground, but the system that “the Americans previously touted as a tested, effective system that can suppress any satellite signal and would thus be able to blind or silence Russian and Chinese satellites – it turned out that this system does not work,” Mikhailov observed.
He also noted that Russian electronic warfare systems are much more advanced than the ones developed by the US, and mentioned multiple reports about Russian systems successfully jamming Starlink satellite signals.
He specifically mentioned the Tirada 2-S systems that “successfully jam satellite communication signals and ‘blind’ the units covered in Starlink satellite dishes.”
Tirada 2-S, Mikhailov explained, is not only capable of suppressing satellite signals – it can also scramble communications and “create false narratives, not only jamming communication channels but deceiving those receiving satellite signals and the satellite in space that receives signals from Earth.”