https://sputnikglobe.com/20260319/nato-war-on-libya-was-organized-aggression-to-plunder-resources--analyst-1123849085.html
NATO War on Libya Was 'Organized Aggression' to Plunder Resources — Analyst
NATO War on Libya Was 'Organized Aggression' to Plunder Resources — Analyst
Sputnik International
Fifteen years after NATO’s intervention in Libya, Western claims that the operation was launched to protect civilians have become “completely obvious” as false, international law expert Dr. Mohammed Mahmoud Mehran told Sputnik.
2026-03-19T03:38+0000
2026-03-19T03:38+0000
2026-03-19T04:45+0000
analysis
muammar gaddafi
libya
nato
intervention
foreign intervention
western intervention
us
war of aggression
2011 libya military intervention
https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07ea/03/13/1123849242_0:0:2501:1407_1920x0_80_0_0_79880144eaa3b6fca785b81fb6c25dcb.jpg
“The NATO war against Libya was an organized crime of aggression aimed at plundering resources and destroying the gold dinar,” Mehran said.According to the expert, the operation was in fact “organized aggression aimed at destroying a model African state that challenged Western financial hegemony through the gold dinar project.”Among the achievements he highlighted were an illiteracy eradication rate of 87%, fully free education and healthcare, state scholarships for study abroad, free electricity, interest-free loans, and gasoline priced at $0.14 per liter — “cheaper than water.”He argued that NATO “turned Libya from the country with the highest standard of living in Africa into a failed state plunged into chaos and civil wars,” calling the intervention “a gross violation of the UN Charter and a dangerous precedent in international law.”The expert said the real motives behind the intervention were “purely economic and geopolitical.” In particular, he pointed to Muammar Gaddafi’s project for a unified African currency — the gold dinar — backed by 143 tons of gold.According to Mehran, the initiative “threatened the dominance of the dollar and the CFA franc” and “could have freed Africa from financial dependence on the West.” He added that leaked emails from former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “confirmed that the gold dinar was the main reason for the war, not the protection of civilians.”Libyan oil was also a strategic objective, he said, noting that Western corporations such as Total and BP sought greater control over the country’s resources after Gaddafi introduced tougher terms “in the interests of the Libyan state.”Mehran also pointed to the scandal surrounding former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, saying he “promoted the military intervention to conceal financing of his 2007 election campaign by Gaddafi.” Sarkozy’s conviction in France in 2025, he argued, “proves that the war was a personal and financial conspiracy, not the protection of human rights.”On the legal side, Mehran said UN Security Council Resolution 1973 authorized the protection of civilians, not regime change. In his words, NATO “grossly exceeded its mandate, turning the operation into a full-scale war to overthrow the Libyan government.”He added that this violated Article 2 of the UN Charter, which prohibits interference in the internal affairs of states, and noted that Russia and China objected to such an interpretation of the resolution, but NATO ignored their position.Mehran said the consequences are still visible in Libya today, which he described as facing “two civil wars, three competing governments, armed militias, human trafficking and the collapse of state services.”Mehran called Libya “a harsh lesson for the world” and urged developing countries not to trust Western rhetoric about humanitarian intervention, warning that “humanitarian wars serve as a cover for a new colonial plunder.”
https://sputnikglobe.com/20230215/from-arab-spring-to-failed-state-winter-how-gaddafis-misplaced-trust-in-the-west-led-to-his-demise-1107470635.html
https://sputnikglobe.com/20200121/rome-voices-concern-over-suspension-of-oil-production-in-libya-1078097939.html
libya
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
2026
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
News
en_EN
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
libya war, war in libya, us war, foreign war, war on terror, hillary clinton, muammar gaddafi, killing of gaddafi, nato strikes, us strikes, us intervention, us attack, nato attack, nato intervention, us invasion, nato forces, us forces
libya war, war in libya, us war, foreign war, war on terror, hillary clinton, muammar gaddafi, killing of gaddafi, nato strikes, us strikes, us intervention, us attack, nato attack, nato intervention, us invasion, nato forces, us forces
NATO War on Libya Was 'Organized Aggression' to Plunder Resources — Analyst
03:38 GMT 19.03.2026 (Updated: 04:45 GMT 19.03.2026) Fifteen years after NATO’s intervention in Libya, Western claims that the operation was launched to protect civilians have become “completely obvious” as false, international law expert Dr. Mohammed Mahmoud Mehran told Sputnik.
“The NATO war against Libya was an organized crime of aggression aimed at plundering resources and destroying the gold dinar,” Mehran said.
According to the expert, the operation was in fact “organized aggression aimed at destroying a model African state that challenged Western financial hegemony through the gold dinar project.”
Mehran said Libya before 2011 “was a model state by all indicators, not a grim dictatorship as portrayed by Western media.” He noted that the country ranked 53rd in the world and first in Africa in the 2010 Human Development Index.
Among the achievements he highlighted were an illiteracy eradication rate of 87%, fully free education and healthcare, state scholarships for study abroad, free electricity, interest-free loans, and gasoline priced at $0.14 per liter — “cheaper than water.”
He argued that NATO “turned Libya from the country with the highest standard of living in Africa into a failed state plunged into chaos and civil wars,” calling the intervention “a gross violation of the UN Charter and a dangerous precedent in international law.”
The expert said the real motives behind the intervention were “purely economic and geopolitical.” In particular, he pointed to Muammar Gaddafi’s project for a unified African currency — the gold dinar — backed by 143 tons of gold.
15 February 2023, 17:53 GMT
According to Mehran, the initiative “threatened the dominance of the dollar and the CFA franc” and “could have freed Africa from financial dependence on the West.” He added that leaked emails from former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “confirmed that the gold dinar was the main reason for the war, not the protection of civilians.”
Libyan oil was also a strategic objective, he said, noting that Western corporations such as Total and BP sought greater control over the country’s resources after Gaddafi introduced tougher terms “in the interests of the Libyan state.”
21 January 2020, 22:40 GMT
Mehran also pointed to the scandal surrounding former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, saying he “promoted the military intervention to conceal financing of his 2007 election campaign by Gaddafi.” Sarkozy’s conviction in France in 2025, he argued, “proves that the war was a personal and financial conspiracy, not the protection of human rights.”
On the legal side, Mehran said UN Security Council Resolution 1973 authorized the protection of civilians, not regime change. In his words, NATO “grossly exceeded its mandate, turning the operation into a full-scale war to overthrow the Libyan government.”
He added that this violated Article 2 of the UN Charter, which prohibits interference in the internal affairs of states, and noted that Russia and China objected to such an interpretation of the resolution, but NATO ignored their position.
Mehran said the consequences are still visible in Libya today, which he described as facing “two civil wars, three competing governments, armed militias, human trafficking and the collapse of state services.”
“This is the democracy that NATO brought instead of a model state,” he said, adding that the Libyan people have been “paying for this Western conspiracy for 15 years,” while “NATO has not been held accountable.”
Mehran called Libya “a harsh lesson for the world” and urged developing countries not to trust Western rhetoric about humanitarian intervention, warning that “humanitarian wars serve as a cover for a new colonial plunder.”
