- Sputnik International
World
Get the latest news from around the world, live coverage, off-beat stories, features and analysis.

Nanny State? New Jersey Bill Would Ban Drinking Coffee Behind the Wheel

© Flickr / erockaNanny State: NJ Bill Would Ban Drinking Coffee and Eating While Driving
Nanny State: NJ Bill Would Ban Drinking Coffee and Eating While Driving - Sputnik International
Subscribe
A new “distracted driving” bill has activists outraged, as it proposes fines and penalties for many new offenses, including eating a snack on the road.

US police - Sputnik International
Black Man Shot to Death by Police During Traffic Stop in Minnesota
The bill would target drivers who eat, drink, groom, read or use electronic devices while driving, NJ.com reports, and could lead to a license suspension.

The new legislation would prohibit "any activity unrelated to the actual operation of a motor vehicle in a manner that interferes with the safe operation of the vehicle on a public road or highway."

New Jersey Democratic sponsors, Assemblymen John Wisniewski and Nicholas Chiaravalloti, aim to take a bite out of motorists’ wallets if they eat while driving, with a $200-$400 fine for the first offense, $400-$600 for the second offense, and $600-$800, plus up to a 90-day license suspension and points on your insurance, for third and subsequent offenses.

Wisniewski claims that the bill isn’t meant to punish drivers, but rather to “educate them” with hefty fees and, in true “Jersey” style: punishments.

"The issue is that we need to try, in every way, to discourage distracted driving, it's dangerous," Wisniewski told NJ.com. "Education and enforcement can change the attitudes of people."

Opponents of the bill argue that it is an overreach, and entirely unnecessary due to already existing laws.

Two police officers shot dead an unarmed passenger during a traffic stop in New Jersey on Dec. 30, 2014. - Sputnik International
NJ Police Gun Down Unarmed Black Man During Traffic Stop (VIDEO)

"This proposed distracted driving law is not needed, since three statutes can be used when a distraction causes unsafe actions, like swerving or crossing a line," Steve Carrellas, policy and government affairs director for the National Motorists Association state chapter, contended. "There is unsafe driving, careless driving and reckless driving."

"Would [the bill] make changing the radio station or adjusting the volume illegal? What about talking to a passenger?" Carrellas asked.

Wisniewski has proposed similar bills in the past. All have failed.


Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала