While the announcement of the new blue British passport has stirred division in the United Kingdom, the controversy was made considerably worse by a claim made by James Caan on Twitter that the new passport would cost £500 million. The tweet, which has since been deleted, was shared nearly 30,000 times. Director of communications for the UK Prime Minister Robbie Gibb lashed out at the tweet, saying that it harms British democracy.
![Screenshot Screenshot - Sputnik International](https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/106028/40/1060284075_0:0:750:488_600x0_80_0_0_2796e0914a19db16f8f777202189dbb0.jpg)
Fake news harms our democracy. Those who would deliberately misrepresent public policy for political gain — be it passports or animal sentience — should be called out.
— Robbie Gibb (@RobbieGibb) December 23, 2017
READ MORE: Black or Blue? Twitterians Struggle to Decide What Color UK Passport Was
Caan came out the day after, admitting on twitter that his claim was "fake news", but said that he still thought that as a society, Britain should prioritize tackling child poverty and homelessness.
Good news. Having researched the cost of providing new passports it appears the £500m for the colour is fake news. However, that doesn’t detract from my intention that together as a society we need to prioritise tackling issues such as children in poverty and homelessness.
— James Caan CBE (@jamescaan) December 23, 2017
British Home Office minister Brandon Lewis was also prompted to chime in during the storm on twitter, asking for Caan to correct his "false statement."
No doubt @AngelaRayner & @jamescaan et al are just waiting for the perfect time today to correct their false statements on the #BluePassport?? For clarity: New passport will NOT cost tax payer extra money. #factcheck
— Brandon Lewis (@BrandonLewis) December 22, 2017
On December 22nd, British PM Theresa May confirmed that the UK was adopting a new, blue passport for the post-Brexit era. While she celebrated the move as a symbol of "sovereignty and independence," critics point out that the UK was never required to adopt the burgundy red which was recommended by a legally non-binding European Council resolution from 1981, reports the BBC. This was echoed in a December 23rd tweet by Guy Verhofstad, chief Brexit coordinator for the European Parliament.
There is no EU legislation dictating passport colour. The UK could have had any passport colour it wanted and stay in the EU https://t.co/bkQX0T0F2Q
— Guy Verhofstadt (@guyverhofstadt) December 23, 2017