“It is not the United States that decides who is the leader of Europe, but the economy. Of course, [the] Americans can create an artificial hierarchy of their allies, especially for propaganda purposes. Finally, however, they will always choose, firstly, Israel, and secondly, anyone with a sufficiently high economic and military potential, of course under US control. [The] Germans still meet these criteria [the] most [out] of all Europeans, but it was quite obvious that Washington would indirectly express its dissatisfaction with the further centralisation of the European Union,” Rekas explained.
“The new Polish government arouses much more sympathy on the banks of [the] Potomac than the previous one, primarily due to the phraseology used: equally anti-Russian, but more progressive. ‘Zelensky may be losing, but we still have Tusk and Sikorski!’ – goes the Anglo-Saxon message, [which is] very dangerous for Poland.”