- Sputnik International
World
Get the latest news from around the world, live coverage, off-beat stories, features and analysis.

New York Times Retracts Rumor on Russia-Gate Following Ridicule

© AFP 2023 / Emmanuel DunandPeople walk by the entrance to US newspaper 'The New York Times' in New York
People walk by the entrance to US newspaper 'The New York Times' in New York - Sputnik International
Subscribe
The New York Times has finally retracted its assertion that 17 US national intelligence agencies had unanimously agreed that Russia organized cyberattacks against the US.

On Thursday, the New York Times issued a correction of a June 25 White House Memo report by correspondent Maggie Haberman: "The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies – the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community."

Russia Today logo - Sputnik International
RT America Host Finds 15 Fakes in The New York Times' Article Dedicated to Him

The Times’ retraction fails to reflect the fact that even those four agencies weren’t in full agreement.

The National Security Agency (NSA) is the main body that can trace and track all incoming and outgoing cyber activity on US networks, according to CIA analyst Ray McGovern. They offered a "moderate" confidence level in the allegations of Russian hacking in the report cited by the Times. 

"If this was a hack, NSA would know about it. NSA does not know about it," he said in an April interview. "Matter of fact, when the CIA and FBI said, 'we have high confidence' … NSA, which is the only real agency that has the capability to trace these things, said 'well, we only have moderate confidence.'"

"In the Army we call that the SWAG factor: a scientific wild-ass guess," McGovern said.

Methodologically, the US intelligence community simply doesn’t just leap to consensus conclusions, making unanimous consent suspicious. Instead, the process allows for dissenting opinions. "The Times’ grudging correction was vindication for some Russia-gate skeptics who had questioned the claim of a full-scale intelligence assessment," Robert Parry wrote for Consortium News on Thursday, "which would usually take the form of a National Intelligence Estimate (or NIE), a product that seeks out the views of the entire Intelligence Community and includes dissents."

US Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton in Tempe, Arizona, on November 2, 2016 and US Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump in Warren, Michigan on October 31, 2016. - Sputnik International
Ex-US Intel Operatives Demand Evidence of ‘Russian Hacking’ – If It Exists

What’s more, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper even admitted on January 6 that the analysts responsible for preparing the report were "hand-picked," which leaves open the possibility that the report was written for political, rather than intelligence, purposes.

"As any intelligence expert will tell you, if you 'hand-pick' the analysts, you are really hand-picking the conclusion," Parry wrote.

The end result: Hillary Clinton and other top Democrats have had the full force of the US intelligence community to cite this "fictional consensus," Parry noted.

Chelsea Clinton, left, and her mother, former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton - Sputnik International
'Bullsh*t': Ex-Clinton Aide Furious After Getting Thrown ‘Under the Bus’

He cited Clinton’s sophisticated rhetoric at the May 31 Re-Code conference, where she blamed "non-existent" data for her loss: "Seventeen agencies, all in agreement, which I know from my experience as a senator and secretary of state, is hard to get. They concluded with high confidence that the Russians ran an extensive information war campaign against my campaign, to influence voters in the election."

Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала