https://sputnikglobe.com/20230429/tucker-carlson-was-trying-to-get-to-the-truth-amid-virtually-nonexistent-us-independent-media-1109944118.html
Tucker Carlson Was 'Trying to Get to the Truth' Amid 'Virtually Nonexistent' US Independent Media
Tucker Carlson Was 'Trying to Get to the Truth' Amid 'Virtually Nonexistent' US Independent Media
Sputnik International
Truthful media coverage in the United States is frowned upon, Larry Johnson, a retired CIA intelligence officer, told Sputnik.
2023-04-29T13:21+0000
2023-04-29T13:21+0000
2023-04-29T14:35+0000
us
tucker carlson
fox news
jeff bezos
censorship
propaganda
msm
mainstream media
freedom of speech
human rights
https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07e7/04/18/1109798464_0:0:3073:1728_1920x0_80_0_0_91a0c3644de85a36e4995e7766901a30.jpg
Truthful media coverage of a whole host of issues in the United States is discouraged. It is even frowned upon, Larry Johnson, a former US official, told Sputnik in the wake of the abrupt departure of Tucker Carlson from Fox News.He pointed out that The Washington Post, owned by Jeff Bezos of Amazon, “has become very much of a political outlet, as opposed to a news outlet”. Similarly, The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, all previously separate newspapers, have been “consolidated under centralized corporate control.”Several days after Fox News unexpectedly announced on April 24 that its outspoken anchor Tucker Carlson would be parting ways with the cable news network, the pundit himself made a video address telling viewers that media bosses were trying to stifle any form of debate in the industry.In his monologue, Carlson said that debates on "big topics" like war, corporate power, and civil liberties “are not permitted in American media," because, "both political parties - and their donors - have reached consensus… to shut down any conversation about it.”Weighing in on the seasoned journalist’s verbal barrage, Larry Johnson agreed that truthful media coverage in the US is being stifled.Even attempts in the media to label Tucker Carlson, who was refusing to accept official narratives, as a right-winger, Johnson said, was a “hallmark of censorship.” The journalist was simply somebody who was trying to get to the truth, the one-time State Department official underscored. He deplored the “tremendous amounts of propaganda” in the United States, adding: "What I see now is there is far more press freedom in Russia than in the United States, or places like Canada." What was once an open society, allowing the questioning of issues, with “an aggressive, actually free press,” has transformed into a landscape of “almost state-controlled media,” with “people happily involved with suppressing dissident voices,” the retired CIA intelligence officer stated.Larry Johnson concluded by urging people to look at multiple sources and listen to as many voices as possible to be able to “make their own judgment.”
https://sputnikglobe.com/20230427/carlson-in-first-post-fox-commentary-claims-those-in-power-resort-to-force-to-kill-debate-1109867382.html
https://sputnikglobe.com/20230426/tucker-carlson-could-no-longer-be-tolerated-by-corrupt-us-media-political-elite-1109845389.html
americas
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
2023
News
en_EN
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07e7/04/18/1109798464_62:0:2793:2048_1920x0_80_0_0_bd96ba16845a2fa8b06bd697bee12fb7.jpgSputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
fox news, tucker carlson, tucker carlson dismissal, nonexistent independent media, centralized corporate control of media, concentration of power, propaganda, almost state-controlled media, suppressing dissident voices
fox news, tucker carlson, tucker carlson dismissal, nonexistent independent media, centralized corporate control of media, concentration of power, propaganda, almost state-controlled media, suppressing dissident voices
Tucker Carlson Was 'Trying to Get to the Truth' Amid 'Virtually Nonexistent' US Independent Media
13:21 GMT 29.04.2023 (Updated: 14:35 GMT 29.04.2023) Tucker Carlson’s departure from Fox News comes as independent media appears to have been muzzled in the US, with corporations playing a hefty role in limiting the kind of information that gets out to people, Larry Johnson, retired CIA intelligence officer and State Department official, told Sputnik.
Truthful media coverage of a whole host of issues in the United States is discouraged.
It is even frowned upon, Larry Johnson, a former US official, told Sputnik in the wake of the abrupt
departure of Tucker Carlson from Fox News.
"Media corporations over the course of the last 30 years have become increasingly concentrated in a small number of organizations. So, the independent media that used to exist is virtually nonexistent now, except for what appears on the Internet and podcasts,” the retired CIA intelligence officer stated.
He pointed out that The Washington Post, owned by Jeff Bezos of Amazon, “has become very much of a political outlet, as opposed to a news outlet”. Similarly, The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, all previously separate newspapers, have been “consolidated under centralized corporate control.”
“Those corporations play a heavy role in limiting the kind of information that gets out to people. That coupled with reporters who are desperate to keep their jobs, and normally they'll just play along with whatever the company policies are,” Larry Johnson said.
Several days after Fox News unexpectedly announced on April 24 that its outspoken anchor Tucker Carlson would be parting ways with the cable news network, the pundit himself made a
video address telling viewers that media bosses were trying to stifle any form of debate in the industry.
"The people in charge… are hysterical and aggressive. They're afraid. They’ve given up persuasion - they’re resorting to force... But it won’t work… true things prevail," Carlson said in a two-minute video clip posted on his Twitter account on Wednesday.
In his monologue, Carlson said that debates on "big topics" like war, corporate power, and civil liberties “are not permitted in American media," because, "both political parties - and their donors - have reached consensus… to shut down any conversation about it.”
Weighing in on the seasoned journalist’s verbal barrage, Larry Johnson agreed that truthful media coverage in the US is being stifled.
“The corporate media’s normal coverage about economic issues, for example, is always trying to emphasize the positive, even when the actual data points to some very alarming trends. On the foreign policy front this comes down to the concentration of power in the hands of a few corporations, and those corporations are wielding enormous influence. Basically, the defense industry and the pharmaceutical industry in the United States have enormous influence over the public debate, what gets publicized and what is ignored,” he said.
Even attempts in the media to label Tucker Carlson, who was refusing to accept official narratives, as a right-winger, Johnson said, was a “hallmark of censorship.” The journalist was simply somebody who was trying to get to the truth, the one-time State Department official underscored.
"Tucker is really more of a libertarian from the standpoint that he does not subscribe to the positions of the Republican Party or the Democrat Party. But he would take each issue on its own, and ask legitimate questions, such as the protests that took place on January 6, 2021 [which] were described by the regime as an insurrection and [it] characterized anybody who was up there on Capitol Hill as basically a terrorist. In fact, the vast majority of the people out there were peaceful and they were not attacking and destroying the Capitol by any standpoint," Larry Johnson explained.
He deplored the “tremendous amounts of propaganda” in the United States, adding: "What I see now is there is far more press freedom in Russia than in the United States, or places like Canada."
What was once an open society, allowing the questioning of issues, with “an aggressive, actually free press,” has transformed into a landscape of “almost state-controlled media,” with “people happily involved with suppressing dissident voices,” the retired CIA intelligence officer stated.
Larry Johnson concluded by urging people to look at multiple sources and listen to as many voices as possible to be able to “make their own judgment.”