https://sputnikglobe.com/20230709/crimean-bridge-attack-confession-shows-zelensky-us-no-longer-pretending-to-be-good-guys-1111777734.html
Crimean Bridge Attack Confession Shows Zelensky, US No Longer 'Pretending to Be Good Guys’
Crimean Bridge Attack Confession Shows Zelensky, US No Longer 'Pretending to Be Good Guys’
Sputnik International
The October 8, 2022 attack on the Crimean Bridge was a ‘crossing the Rubicon’ moment in the Ukrainian crisis, freeing Moscow’s hands to lift self-imposed restrictions on precision missile strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure. Why did Kiev decide to admit responsibility now? Observers queried by Sputnik have a few ideas.
2023-07-09T18:32+0000
2023-07-09T18:32+0000
2023-07-10T12:03+0000
russia
ukraine
volodymyr zelensky
nato
russian foreign ministry
crimean bridge
admission
confession
analysis
https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07e6/0a/08/1101639994_89:0:1277:668_1920x0_80_0_0_893e92da789a6dd323801d34d76a6a62.png
Ukrainian deputy defense minister Hanna Maliar admitted Saturday that Ukraine was responsible for last year’s attack on the Crimean Bridge. “273 days ago we delivered our first strike against the Crimean Bridge in order to disrupt Russia’s logistics,” Maliar wrote in a Telegram post dedicated to Kiev’s “accomplishments” over the course of the conflict as it hit the 500-day mark.Her statement contradicts months of denials by officials in Kiev that Ukraine had anything to do with the terrorist incident. “We definitely did not order that, as far as I know,” President Volodymyr Zelensky said in an interview with Western media in October after Russia began a series of missile strikes on Ukrainian energy infrastructure. Kiev and its allies in the West alternated between blaming feuding Russian internal actors and claiming that Moscow bombed its own bridge in a false flag attack, but Maliar’s confession serves to confirm what Russia has been saying all along: that the terrorist incident was ordered, concocted and carried out by Ukraine’s security services.Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova responded to Saturday’s admission of guilt with two words, calling the Ukrainian government a “terrorist regime.”Timing No Accident“The timing of the deputy defense minister’s admission is most likely not an accident,” Dr. Joe Siracusa, a US politics expert and dean of Global Futures at Curtin University in Australia, told Sputnik, pointing out that the confession comes just days ahead of next week’s NATO summit in Vilnius.Confession is Good for the Soul?Adriel Kasonta, a London-based foreign affairs analyst, journalist and commentator, said that in the space of 48 hours, Kiev and Washington have demonstrated, through Maliar’s confession, and the US announcement that it would be sending deadly cluster munitions to Ukraine, that they just don’t care about even pretending to hold the “moral high ground” in the proxy war against Russia anymore.Suggesting that Kiev’s Western benefactors have already achieved the goal of turning Ukraine into a foreign banker and corporation-controlled vassal whose only purpose is to “weaken Russia,” Kasonta argued that officials in President Zelensky’s administration simply don’t “care anymore about pretending that they are the good guys.”“So the mask fell off and everyone around the world [can] see this conflict for what it is,” he said.Latest in a String of Important AdmissionsSaturday’s statement by Maliar is important, but certainly not the first time that Ukrainian officials have admitted to their role in escalating the conflict.In January, Ukrainian Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov acknowledged that the Ukrainian crisis is really a Russia-NATO proxy war, and that “today” Kiev is “carrying out NATO’s mission,” shedding its soldiers’ lives, and serving as a “shield…defending the entire civilized world, the entire West,” from Russia.In late 2022 and early 2023, Zelensky, former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and former French President Francois Hollande each separately admitted that Kiev never intended to adhere to the terms of the 2015 Minsk peace deal with Russia, and that the agreement was only signed to buy time and prepare for a conflict with Moscow.
russia
ukraine
crimean bridge
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
2023
News
en_EN
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
crimean bridge, russia, ukraine, terror attack, terrorist attack, admission of guilt, admission, confession
crimean bridge, russia, ukraine, terror attack, terrorist attack, admission of guilt, admission, confession
Crimean Bridge Attack Confession Shows Zelensky, US No Longer 'Pretending to Be Good Guys’
18:32 GMT 09.07.2023 (Updated: 12:03 GMT 10.07.2023) The October 8, 2022 attack on the Crimean Bridge was a ‘crossing the Rubicon’ moment in the Ukrainian crisis, freeing Moscow’s hands to lift self-imposed restrictions on precision missile strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure. Why did Kiev decide to admit responsibility now? Observers queried by Sputnik have a few ideas.
Ukrainian deputy defense minister Hanna Maliar admitted Saturday that Ukraine was responsible for last year’s attack on the Crimean Bridge.
“273 days ago we delivered our first strike against the Crimean Bridge in order to disrupt Russia’s logistics,” Maliar
wrote in a Telegram post dedicated to Kiev’s “accomplishments” over the course of the conflict as it hit the 500-day mark.
Her statement contradicts months of denials by officials in Kiev that Ukraine had anything to do with the terrorist incident. “We definitely did not order that, as far as I know,” President Volodymyr Zelensky said in an interview with Western media in October after Russia began a series of missile strikes on Ukrainian energy infrastructure. Kiev and its allies in the West alternated between blaming feuding Russian internal actors and claiming that Moscow bombed its own bridge in a false flag attack, but Maliar’s confession serves to confirm what Russia has been saying all along: that the terrorist incident was
ordered, concocted and carried out by Ukraine’s security services.
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova responded to Saturday’s admission of guilt with two words, calling the Ukrainian government a
“terrorist regime.”“The timing of the deputy defense minister’s admission is most likely not an accident,” Dr. Joe Siracusa, a US politics expert and dean of Global Futures at Curtin University in Australia, told Sputnik, pointing out that the confession comes just days ahead of next week’s NATO summit in Vilnius.
“Rather it is designed to put maximum pressure on NATO members in the run up to the Vilnius Summit. Running out of ammunition, Ukraine is compelled to leverage whatever it can on sympathetic NATO members before the summit,” Siracusa said. “What’s next? I wouldn’t be surprised if Kiev [took] credit for blowing [up[ the Nord Stream pipelines.”
Confession is Good for the Soul?
Adriel Kasonta, a London-based foreign affairs analyst, journalist and commentator, said that in the space of 48 hours, Kiev and Washington have demonstrated, through Maliar’s confession, and the US announcement that it would be sending deadly cluster munitions to Ukraine, that they just don’t care about even pretending to hold the “moral high ground” in the proxy war against Russia anymore.
“Everyone who is following what is happening in Ukraine since 2014 knew from the very start that it was the Ukrainian side that was behind the bombing of the Crimean Bridge. Perhaps the Ukrainian side, because of the huge losses [in the ongoing counteroffensive, ed.] and the assurance from the American side…that Ukrainian fighters will be provided with cluster bombs, decided not to play this silly game of pretending that someone else is behind the terrorist attacks conducted throughout this conflict,” Kasonta told Sputnik.
Suggesting that Kiev’s Western benefactors have already achieved the goal of turning Ukraine into a foreign banker and corporation-controlled vassal whose only purpose is to “weaken Russia,” Kasonta argued that officials in President Zelensky’s administration simply don’t “care anymore about pretending that they are the good guys.”
“So the mask fell off and everyone around the world [can] see this conflict for what it is,” he said.
Latest in a String of Important Admissions
Saturday’s statement by Maliar is important, but certainly not the first time that Ukrainian officials have admitted to their role in escalating the conflict.
In January, Ukrainian Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov
acknowledged that the Ukrainian crisis is really a Russia-NATO proxy war, and that “today” Kiev is “carrying out NATO’s mission,” shedding its soldiers’ lives, and serving as a “shield…defending the entire civilized world, the entire West,” from Russia.
In late 2022 and early 2023,
Zelensky, former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and former French President Francois Hollande each separately admitted that Kiev
never intended to adhere to the terms of the
2015 Minsk peace deal with Russia, and that the agreement was only signed to buy time and prepare for a conflict with Moscow.
