https://sputnikglobe.com/20230822/new-memos-hint-at-bidens-personal-interest-in-firing-ukraine-prosecutor-targeting-burisma-1112791288.html
New Memos Hint at Biden's Personal Interest in Firing Ukraine Prosecutor Targeting Burisma
New Memos Hint at Biden's Personal Interest in Firing Ukraine Prosecutor Targeting Burisma
Sputnik International
New memos indicate that then-Vice President Joe Biden did not act in concert with the US government when he threatened to withhold $1 billion in Ukraine aid unless the Poroshenko government fired the prosecutor general who targeted Hunter Biden's Ukrainian employer at that time.
2023-08-22T14:21+0000
2023-08-22T14:21+0000
2023-09-20T13:30+0000
us
americas
joe biden
donald trump
hunter biden
ukraine
washington
democrats
burisma
council on foreign relations
https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07e7/07/18/1112113948_0:0:2920:1643_1920x0_80_0_0_6d5abaf0a657f500ac73d13b92d8890d.jpg
Joe Biden and Democrats have repeatedly stressed that his insistence on firing Ukrainian then-Prosecutor General Viktor Shokhin back in December 2015 was consistent with the US policy of stamping out corruption in Ukraine.At the time, then-Vice President Joe Biden even went so far as to threaten then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko that Washington would deprive Ukraine of a much-needed $1 billion loan guarantee in case the latter did not fire Shokhin. The conversation reportedly occurred in December 2015. Biden openly bragged about the incident to the Council on Foreign Relations gathering in January 2018:However, memos by Treasury and Justice Department officials obtained by Just the News, an independent US media outlet founded by award-winning investigative journalist John Solomon, indicate that the US government held Shokhin in high regard at the time and concluded that Ukraine had made progress in fighting endemic corruption, thus deserving the loan guarantee.Moreover, Senior State Department officials sent Shokhin a personal note saying they were "impressed" with his office's work and invited him and his staff to Washington for a January 2016 strategy session prior to his sacking.Remarkably, an audio tape from March 2016 which appeared to record Biden and Poroshenko's conversation showed that the Ukrainian president pointed out that there was no evidence that Shokhin and his office were anyhow mired in corruption:Per Solomon, Biden's political maneuver stemmed from the fact that the latter had been aggressively investigating Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian gas firm that hired Joe's son Hunter in 2014 and paid him a hefty salary of $83,333 a month despite Hunter having no expertise or experience in the energy sphere.What's more, Hunter's business associate Devon Archer, who was also employed by Burisma at the time, testified to the House Oversight Committee on July 31 that Shokhin's investigation was rattling the Ukrainian gas firm and that the Burisma leadership was putting pressure on Hunter to deal with it.Joe Biden's role in firing Shokhin created much controversy in 2019, when House Democrats pushed ahead with the impeachment of then-President Donald Trump who asked Poroshenko's successor, Volodymyr Zelensky, to look into the Bidens' conduct in a phone conversation.Democratic lawmakers and officials testified during Trump's first impeachment that Joe's actions in withholding the $1 billion in aid had nothing to do with Hunter and were thoroughly consistent with the US government's Ukraine policy. Per Solomon, this narrative appears to be false.The US investigative journalist specifically quoted lawyers who worked on Trump's impeachment defense. They said that they didn't have access to the memos unearthed by Just the News, showing that the Obama government was satisfied with Shokhin's work. As per Trump's former legal team, the documents in question would have made a significant difference to the Trump impeachment case. In October 2020, a concerted action by the former top brass of US intelligence agencies, Silicon Valley giants and the US mainstream press smeared a legitimate story by the New York Post stemming from files of a so-called "laptop from hell", belonging to Hunter Biden, as "Russian disinformation". It turned out later that the damning materials on the infamous laptop were genuine.
https://sputnikglobe.com/20230822/attorneys-allegedly-threatened-to-put-biden-on-witness-stand-if-hunter-was-charged-1112774995.html
https://sputnikglobe.com/20230817/how-western-big-tech-firms-wipe-away-hunter-bidens-many-sins-1112668508.html
https://sputnikglobe.com/20230223/mtg-slams-biden-for-kissing-zelenskys-a--dragging-us-all-kicking-and-screaming-into-world-war-1107726201.html
https://sputnikglobe.com/20230625/fbi-knew-hunter-bidens-laptop-was-reliable-before-smearing-it-as-russian-disinfo-1111457950.html
americas
ukraine
washington
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rosiya Segodnya“
2023
News
en_EN
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rosiya Segodnya“
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rosiya Segodnya“
joe biden, hunter biden, ukrainian firm burisma, prosecutor general viktor shokhin, viktor shokin, influence peddling, pay-to-play, hunter biden burisma, bidens, trump impeachment, why did biden threaten to withhold $1 billion loan from ukraine, hunter biden laptop from hell
joe biden, hunter biden, ukrainian firm burisma, prosecutor general viktor shokhin, viktor shokin, influence peddling, pay-to-play, hunter biden burisma, bidens, trump impeachment, why did biden threaten to withhold $1 billion loan from ukraine, hunter biden laptop from hell
New Memos Hint at Biden's Personal Interest in Firing Ukraine Prosecutor Targeting Burisma
14:21 GMT 22.08.2023 (Updated: 13:30 GMT 20.09.2023) New memos indicate that then-Vice President Joe Biden did not act in concert with the US government when he threatened to withhold $1 billion in Ukraine aid unless the Poroshenko government fired the prosecutor general who targeted Hunter Biden's Ukrainian employer at that time.
Joe Biden and Democrats have repeatedly stressed that his insistence on firing Ukrainian then-Prosecutor General Viktor Shokhin back in December 2015 was consistent with the US policy of stamping out corruption in Ukraine.
At the time, then-Vice President Joe Biden even went so far as to threaten then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko that Washington would deprive Ukraine of a much-needed $1 billion loan guarantee in case the latter did not fire Shokhin. The conversation reportedly occurred in December 2015. Biden openly bragged about the incident to the Council on Foreign Relations gathering in January 2018:
"I said, 'You’re not getting the billion.' I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.' Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time."
22 August 2023, 03:12 GMT
However,
memos by Treasury and Justice Department officials obtained by Just the News, an independent US media outlet founded by award-winning investigative journalist John Solomon, indicate that the US government held Shokhin in high regard at the time and concluded that Ukraine had made progress in fighting endemic corruption, thus deserving the loan guarantee.
"Ukraine has made sufficient progress on its reform agenda to justify a third guarantee," read an October 1, 2015, memo by the Interagency Policy Committee (IPC), a Barack Obama task force.
Moreover, Senior State Department officials sent Shokhin a personal note saying they were "impressed" with his office's work and invited him and his staff to Washington for a January 2016 strategy session prior to his sacking.
Remarkably, an audio tape from March 2016 which appeared to record Biden and Poroshenko's conversation showed that the Ukrainian president pointed out that there was no evidence that Shokhin and his office were anyhow mired in corruption:
"Despite the fact that we didn't have any corruption charges, we don't have any information about him doing something wrong, I especially asked him … No, it was the day before yesterday. I especially asked him to resign," Poroshenko allegedly told Biden in a tape released in 2020 by then-parliamentarian Andrii Derkach.
17 August 2023, 17:21 GMT
Per Solomon, Biden's political maneuver stemmed from the fact that the latter had been aggressively investigating Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian gas firm that hired Joe's son Hunter in 2014 and paid him
a hefty salary of $83,333 a month despite Hunter having no expertise or experience in the energy sphere.
What's more,
Hunter's business associate Devon Archer, who was also employed by Burisma at the time, testified to the House Oversight Committee on July 31 that Shokhin's investigation was rattling the Ukrainian gas firm and that the Burisma leadership was putting pressure on Hunter to deal with it.
Joe Biden's role in firing Shokhin created much controversy in 2019, when House Democrats pushed ahead with the impeachment of then-President Donald Trump who asked Poroshenko's successor, Volodymyr Zelensky, to look into
the Bidens' conduct in a phone conversation.
23 February 2023, 05:51 GMT
Democratic lawmakers and officials testified during Trump's first impeachment that Joe's actions in withholding the $1 billion in aid had nothing to do with Hunter and were thoroughly consistent with the US government's Ukraine policy. Per Solomon, this narrative appears to be false.
The US investigative journalist specifically quoted lawyers who worked on Trump's impeachment defense. They said that they didn't have access to the memos unearthed by Just the News, showing that the Obama government was satisfied with Shokhin's work. As per Trump's former legal team, the documents in question would have made a significant difference to the Trump impeachment case.
The Democratic Party's apparent attempts to shield Biden, who announced his presidential bid on April 25, 2019, seemingly fit into a broader set of actions by US officials, Biden campaign aides, intelligence operatives, Big Tech and Big Media to suppress any narrative which could cast a shadow on the Bidens' conduct.
In October 2020,
a concerted action by the former top brass of US intelligence agencies, Silicon Valley giants and the US mainstream press smeared a legitimate story by the New York Post stemming from files of a so-called "
laptop from hell", belonging to Hunter Biden, as "Russian disinformation". It turned out later that the damning materials on the infamous laptop were genuine.
