- Sputnik International, 1920
Analysis
Enjoy in-depth, acute analysis of the most pressing local, regional and global trends at Sputnik!

Scott Ritter Lists Two Things That Need to Happen for Trump to Get His Ceasefire at Alaska Summit

Subscribe
The Ukrainian crisis is front and center of the Putin-Trump summit in Alaska. Sputnik asked renowned geopolitical analyst, former Marine Corps intelligence officer and ex-UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter to weigh in on the high stakes meeting.
First things first: the US president “doesn’t care about the geopolitical nuances of Ukrainian battlefield locations,” Ritter said.
“If Putin can convince him that the quickest route to a ceasefire is for Ukraine to leave” Russia’s new territories “and say no to NATO, that’s it. That’s all that has to happen for a ceasefire.”
The Russian military has mastered drone warfare, counter-drone warfare, and new battlefield tactics to the point where its advance has become “an irreversible process,” Ritter added, commenting on what happens if the peace push doesn't pan out.
“There’s nothing that can be done. Nothing can be done to stop this. The advantage is 100% Russia, and we’re looking at the Ukrainians on the verge of total collapse,” the observer stressed.

Can Trump Convince Congress?

Trump’s base doesn’t want to continue fueling a proxy conflict against Russia, much less getting into a hot war with Russia over Ukraine, Ritter said.
“Don’t worry about Congress. They don’t elect the president, and they will fall in behind the president, because if he can secure his base with a peace deal, he can ruin everybody in Congress, especially a Republican, who goes against him,” he stressed.
Judge Napolitano Breaks Down Alaska Summit and the Chance for a 'Grand Reset' in Russia-US Ties - Sputnik International, 1920, 15.08.2025
Analysis
Judge Napolitano Breaks Down Alaska Summit and the Chance for a 'Grand Reset' in Russia-US Ties

Ritter's Bombshell: World Came Scarily Close to a Nuclear War

In November 2024, the CIA briefed Congress on the risks of a nuclear war breaking out, estimating that there was a “greater than 50% chance” thanks to the Biden administration’s decision to greenlight long-range ATACMS strikes into Russia, Ritter revealed.
"The director of plans of Strategic Command, the American military command that carries out nuclear war briefed a Washington, DC think tank in November that the United States is prepared for a nuclear exchange with Russia, (that means nuclear war) and that the United States thought they were going to win," he said.
"When this was briefed to Congress, I asked a senior Democrat...'when the CIA briefed you, did the CIA say the Russians were bluffing?' He said no. The CIA said the exact opposite. He said but that's not the scary thing. The scary thing is that the Biden administration officials who were in that room said 'oh we’re ready for that. If the Russians wanna play, we’re ready to go to nuclear war with them.' This is the insanity that existed in November of last year!” Ritter stressed.
The Pentagon is seen from Air Force One as it flies over Washington, March 2, 2022.  - Sputnik International, 1920, 27.11.2024
Military
Pentagon Made No Full Analysis of Consequences of ATACMS Missiles Use on Russia - Hersh
Newsfeed
0
To participate in the discussion
log in or register
loader
Chats
Заголовок открываемого материала