https://sputnikglobe.com/20250217/trumps-us-may-exit-nato-if-europe-derails-us-russia-talks--ex-pentagon-officer-1121577021.html
Trump's US May Exit NATO if Europe Derails US-Russia Talks – Ex-Pentagon Officer
Trump's US May Exit NATO if Europe Derails US-Russia Talks – Ex-Pentagon Officer
Sputnik International
Trump taking Washington out of NATO “is a realistic threat,” EMP Task Force scholar and former Pentagon officer David Pyne tells Sputnik.
2025-02-17T18:54+0000
2025-02-17T18:54+0000
2025-02-17T18:54+0000
analysis
donald trump
volodymyr zelensky
russia
ukraine
nato
european union (eu)
us
europe
china
https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07e8/0b/10/1120901262_0:160:3072:1888_1920x0_80_0_0_47d0989b5ebf53fa28629f17e9accbf8.jpg
He could do this "by either withdrawing US security guarantees for individual countries that oppose his peace initiatives with Russia to end the war in Ukraine, or else perhaps to threaten to pull the US out of NATO entirely," Pyne says. Trump considered withdrawing from NATO twice during his first term, viewing the alliance as obsolete and seeing no threats to justify a US military presence in Europe. The more the EU and UK try to derail Trump’s peace initiative, the more likely he is to retaliate, says Pyne. The Trump administration is reportedly already considering reducing the 100,000-strong US troop presence in Europe by 20,000. However, if the UK and EU continue to throw a wrench in his gears Trump may slash it by 50,000 or even more, the expert stresses.Zelensky is the Chief Obstacle to Peace in Ukraine US President Donald Trump believes that "the quickest way to resolve the Ukraine war on mutually acceptable terms is through direct negotiations with Russia," Pyne says, commenting on Team Trump’s decision to sideline Europe and the Kiev regime from talks. Unlike his European allies, Trump remembers it was Zelensky who issued a decree — which is still in effect — banning talks with Russia, Pyne highlights. Global Security to be Decided by US, Russia, and China He calls this Yalta 2.0, a reference to the original WW2 pact that brought together the US, USSR, and UK to establish lasting peace. However, this time, Europe would have no seat at the table. While France and the UK are technically nuclear states, they lack the military strength and global influence to shape such negotiations, he argues. No other nations besides Russia and China approach the US military and nuclear capabilities, and both have legitimate claims to regional spheres of influence, Pyne concludes.
https://sputnikglobe.com/20250213/trump-determined-to-undo-damage-to-us-russian-relations--former-pentagon-officer-1121567345.html
https://sputnikglobe.com/20250217/why-ukraine-has-no-bargaining-power-in-us-russia-peace-talks-1121576608.html
russia
ukraine
china
united kingdom (uk)
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
2025
News
en_EN
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
donald trump, vladimir putin, us-russia talks, us-russia negotiations on ukraine, us-russia talks in saudi arabia, volodymyr zelensky, trump can withdraw from nato, european armed forces, yalta 2.0, new global security architecture
donald trump, vladimir putin, us-russia talks, us-russia negotiations on ukraine, us-russia talks in saudi arabia, volodymyr zelensky, trump can withdraw from nato, european armed forces, yalta 2.0, new global security architecture
Trump's US May Exit NATO if Europe Derails US-Russia Talks – Ex-Pentagon Officer
Trump taking Washington out of NATO “is a realistic threat,” EMP Task Force scholar and former Pentagon officer David Pyne tells Sputnik.
He could do this "by either withdrawing US security guarantees for individual countries that oppose his peace initiatives with Russia to end the war in Ukraine, or else perhaps to threaten to pull the US out of NATO entirely," Pyne says.
Trump considered
withdrawing from NATO twice during his first term, viewing the alliance as obsolete and seeing no threats to justify a US military presence in Europe.
The more the EU and UK try to derail Trump’s peace initiative, the more likely he is to retaliate, says Pyne.
The Trump administration is reportedly already considering reducing the 100,000-strong US troop presence in Europe by 20,000. However, if the UK and EU continue to throw a wrench in his gears Trump may slash it by 50,000 or even more, the expert stresses.
Zelensky is the Chief Obstacle to Peace in Ukraine
US President Donald Trump believes that "the quickest way to resolve the Ukraine war on mutually acceptable terms is through direct negotiations with Russia," Pyne says, commenting on Team Trump’s decision to sideline Europe and the Kiev regime from talks.
Unlike his European allies, Trump remembers it was Zelensky who issued a decree — which is still in effect — banning talks with Russia, Pyne highlights.
"Trump's overriding focus is to normalize diplomatic and trade relations with the Russian Federation. Essentially, a new 'Russian reset' to restore pre-2014 relations, in which the US treats the Russian Federation as an equal, with mutual respect, as a fellow nuclear superpower, and cooperates with Russia to restore peace and stability to the world," the expert notes.
Global Security to be Decided by US, Russia, and China
"This is a foreign policy shift I believe President [Donald] Trump could use to ensure future peace and stability while setting clear red lines between the three nuclear powers to prevent interference in each other’s spheres of influence," Pyne says.
He calls this
Yalta 2.0, a reference to the original WW2 pact that brought together the US, USSR, and UK to establish lasting peace. However, this time, Europe would have no seat at the table.
While France and the UK are technically nuclear states, they lack the military strength and global influence to shape such negotiations, he argues.
No other nations besides Russia and China approach the US military and nuclear capabilities, and both have legitimate claims to regional spheres of influence, Pyne concludes.
