https://sputnikglobe.com/20250702/us-and-israel-pursue-regime-change-in-iran-via-lies-and-weaponizing-of-iaea-1122386723.html
US and Israel Pursue Regime Change in Iran via Lies and Weaponizing of IAEA
US and Israel Pursue Regime Change in Iran via Lies and Weaponizing of IAEA
Sputnik International
Iran's move to suspend cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is no surprise. Experts explain why in an interview with Sputnik.
2025-07-02T19:09+0000
2025-07-02T19:09+0000
2025-07-02T19:09+0000
analysis
middle east
turker erturk
israel
tehran
tel aviv
international atomic energy agency (iaea)
nuclear non-proliferation treaty (npt)
us
europe
https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/07e9/06/1a/1122341506_0:62:2160:1277_1920x0_80_0_0_b33e5fae672209f7852a4d45b15a27fd.jpg
After the 12-day war with Israel and a US strike, Iran's decision is an expected outcome, Turkish political analyst Ceyda Karan tells Sputnik. Tehran considers the IAEA responsible for Israel's attack on Iran and apparent spying on behalf of Tel Aviv. For his part, Karan draws attention to the fact that the IAEA neither publicly condemned the illegal attacks by Israel and the US, "nor has it expressed condolences over the deaths of Iranian nuclear scientists with whom it previously cooperated.” Regime Change Plot The attacks' major goal wasn't to disrupt the Iran nuclear program but to trigger regime change in the country, according to retired admiral and expert Turker Erturk. He believes that Israel could continue to push ahead with the coup d'etat plan and the ceasefire might not last for long.
https://sputnikglobe.com/20250702/iran-cuts-off-iaea-over-nuclear-safety-concerns-labels-agency-servant-of-israel-1122383851.html
https://sputnikglobe.com/20250702/strikes-on-irans-nuclear-facilities-raise-serious-concerns---opcw-envoy-1122384974.html
israel
tehran
tel aviv
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
2025
News
en_EN
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
Sputnik International
feedback@sputniknews.com
+74956456601
MIA „Rossiya Segodnya“
iran's nuclear program, grossi, iaea, regime change in iran, israel and us strikes against iran, donald trump, nuclear enrichment, iran nuclear negotiations, nuclear weapons, russia, china, global south
iran's nuclear program, grossi, iaea, regime change in iran, israel and us strikes against iran, donald trump, nuclear enrichment, iran nuclear negotiations, nuclear weapons, russia, china, global south
US and Israel Pursue Regime Change in Iran via Lies and Weaponizing of IAEA
Iran's move to suspend cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is no surprise. Experts explain why in an interview with Sputnik.
After the 12-day war with Israel and a US strike, Iran's decision is an
expected outcome, Turkish political analyst Ceyda Karan tells Sputnik.
Tehran considers the IAEA responsible for Israel's attack on Iran and apparent spying on behalf of Tel Aviv.
For his part, Karan draws attention to the fact that the IAEA neither publicly condemned the illegal attacks by Israel and the US, "nor has it expressed condolences over the deaths of Iranian nuclear scientists with whom it previously cooperated.”
“What comes next? Is it possible for Iran to return to diplomacy and the IAEA inspection system? Without solid guarantees — unlikely. Because we’re talking about opponents who systematically lie and are capable of launching strikes even during negotiations," Karan says.
The attacks' major goal wasn't to disrupt the Iran nuclear program but to trigger regime change in the country, according to retired admiral and expert Turker Erturk.
He believes that Israel could continue to push ahead with the coup d'etat plan and the ceasefire might not last for long.
“Do you know why they agreed to this ceasefire today? Because global public opinion has become more aware," Erturk tells Sputnik. "The unipolar world order is a thing of the past. The Global South is rising. Russia and China have proven highly effective in backroom diplomacy.”
